Cited by 120Neonatal and Maternal InfectionsNosocomial Infections in ICUInfection Control in Healthcare

Risk factors for nosocomial infections in critically ill newborns: A 5-year prospective cohort study

Kawagoe, Julia Y., Segre, Conceição A.M., Pereira, Cresio R., Cardoso, Maria Fatima S., Silva, Claudia V., Fukushima, Julia T.·2001·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

Background Nosocomial infections (NIs) are one of the most important causes of morbidity in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The aim of this study was to identify risk factors (RFs) for NIs among critically ill newborn patients in a Brazilian NICU.Methods This 5-year prospective cohort study in an 8-bed NICU included all infants born in the hospital and admitted to the NICU from 1993 to 1997. Exposure variables were maternal and newborn data prospectively collected from patient records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine independent RFs associated with NIs.Results Univariate analysis indicated gestational age, congenital abnormality, premature rupture of membranes, maternal illness, birth weight, mechanical ventilation, central venous catheter, total parenteral nutrition, peripheral venous catheter, and length of stay as possible RFs. Multivariate analysis identified 5 independent RFs for NIs: premature rupture of membranes (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.51 [95% CI, 1.15-1.99]), maternal disease (HR = 1.57 [95% CI, 1.18-2.07]), mechanical ventilation (HR = 2.43 [95% CI, 1.67-3.53]), central venous catheter (HR = 1.70 [95% CI, 1.21-2.41]), and total parenteral nutrition (HR = 4.04 [95% CI, 2.61-6.25]).Conclusion The recognition of RFs for NIs is an important tool for the identification and development of interventions to minimize such risks in the NICU.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mic.2001.114162

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawagoe, J. Y., Segre, C. A. M., Pereira, C. R., Cardoso, M. F. S., Silva, C. V., & Fukushima, J. T.
Affiliations
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR)
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
109-114
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171433508
Cited by
120
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
nosocomial infections, critically ill neonates, neonatal intensive care, risk factors, premature rupture of membranes, maternal illness, mechanical ventilation, central venous catheters, total parenteral nutrition, congenital malformations, length of hospital stay
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Birth Weight, Brazil, Catheters, Indwelling, Cross Infection, Female, Gestational Age, Hospitals, General, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Length of Stay, Male, Parenteral Nutrition, Total, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial, Risk Factors, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Critical Illness, Infection Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review