Cutaneous photoprotection from ultraviolet injury by green tea polyphenols
Abstract
Background In animal models, extracts from green tea have been shown to be remarkably effective at reducing the severity of adverse human health effects of overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Although sunscreens and other photoprotective measures have traditionally been used for this purpose, there is a need for additional measures and natural products are increasingly being explored for that purpose. Objective Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of polyphenols from green tea on parameters associated with acute UV injury. Methods Areas of skin of normal volunteers were treated with an extract of green tea or one of its constituents. Thirty minutes later, the treated sites were exposed to a 2 minimal erythema dose solar simulated radiation. UV-treated skin was examined clinically for UV-induced erythema, histologically for the presence of sunburn cells or Langerhans cell distributions, or biochemically for UV-induced DNA damage. Results Application of green tea extracts resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of the erythema response evoked by UV radiation. The (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and (-)-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG) polyphenolic fractions were most efficient at inhibiting erythema, whereas (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC) and (-)-epicatechin (EC) had little effect. On histologic examination, skin treated with green tea extracts reduced the number of sunburn cells and protected epidermal Langerhans cells from UV damage. Green tea extracts also reduced the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Green tea polyphenols protect against erythema.
“| Green tea polyphenols | Polyphenolic | Erythema | + | + | (112,113,114) |”
From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [113]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 365
- Authors
- Elmets, C. A., Singh, D., Tubesing, K., Matsui, M., Katiyar, S., & Mukhtar, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Estée Lauder (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-432
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094732589
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ca073096-15, n01cn085083-000, 5r01ca051802-09, 5r01ca079820-05)
- National Cancer Institute (N01 CN 85083 57, CA73096, CA 79820, R01CA078809, CA 78809, CA51802)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Keywords
- green tea polyphenols, photoprotection, sunburn, erythema, epigallocatechin gallate, epicatechin-3-gallate, epigallocatechin, epicatechin, sunburn cells, Langerhans cells, UV-induced DNA damage, chemoprevention, topical application
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Topical, Adolescent, Adult, DNA Damage, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Erythema, Female, Flavonoids, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenols, Polymers, Skin, Sunburn, Sunscreening Agents, Tea, Ultraviolet Rays, Chemoprevention, Polyphenols
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review