Cited by 231Healthcare Systems and TechnologyPrimary Care and Health OutcomesDermatology and Skin Diseases

Dermatology in primary care: prevalence and patient disposition.

Lowell, Brooke A., Froelich, Catherine W., Federman, Daniel G., Kirsner, Robert S.·2001·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Cutaneous disease is commonly encountered in primary care. The frequency of patients presenting to primary care physicians with skin disease and their eventual disposition is not well studied.Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of patients seen with skin disease in a primary care setting and the likelihood of their referral to a dermatologist. The impact the primary care provider had on the quality of skin care was also examined.Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of patients seen during a 2-year period at a general medicine clinic within the University of Miami and upon referral to a University of Miami dermatology office. Data were obtained on the prevalence of skin disease, dispositions of referral, diagnoses made, and procedures performed.Results During a 2-year period, 36.5% of patients who presented to their primary care physician had at least one skin problem. Of 208 patients with skin disease, in 58.7% (122/208) it was their chief complaint. A wide range of diagnoses were made by the primary care physician, with a limited number of diagnostic procedures performed. Of the 37.5% of patients referred to a dermatologist, 68% were referred on initial evaluation. Diagnoses made by the primary care physician were concordant with that made by the dermatologists 57% of the time.Conclusion Patients frequently see their primary care physician for skin disease. A large percentage are referred to dermatologists, often for a biopsy of a suspect lesion, to confirm a suspected diagnosis, or to establish a diagnosis of lesions of unknown origin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mjd.2001.114598

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 231

Authors
Lowell, B. A., Froelich, C. W., Federman, D. G., & Kirsner, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
250-255
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041104177
Cited by
231
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
skin diseases, primary care, prevalence, referral to dermatologist, patient disposition, diagnostic agreement, biopsy
MeSH terms
Adult, Dermatology, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Skin Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review