Cited by 86Uterine Myomas and TreatmentsEndometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatments

Differences in uterine innervation at hysterectomy

Quinn, Martin J., Kirk, Nick·2002·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective Our purpose was to identify patterns of uterine innervation in normal uteri and selected clinical conditions including adenomyosis and chronic pelvic pain. Study design A retrospective survey was performed of stored uteri removed at hysterectomy for a variety of clinical conditions, including 8 uteri from nulliparous subjects (group 1, mean age 40.0 years, range 30-52 years), 21 uteri with no reported histologic abnormality from multiparous subjects (group 2, mean age 43.4 years, range 32-53 years; mean parity 2.0, range 1-4), 31 uteri reported with adenomyosis (group 3, mean age 42.4 years, range 29-54 years; parity 2.0, range 0-4), and 17 uteri from subjects with pelvic pain (group 4, mean age 39.1 years, range 30-52 years; parity 2.5, range 1-7). Sections were cut from paraffin blocks of the isthmus of stored uteri (in the majority of cases) and stained with protein gene product 9.5 to identify nerves. Sections of pancreas provided positive controls. Each section was reviewed by two unblinded observers. Results Group 1 (n = 8, nulliparous uteri) showed significant nerve bundles at the endometrial-myometrial interface and in the subserosal layers, with nerve fibers noted in intervening neurovascular bundles supplying the myometrial stroma. Group 2 (n = 21, histologically normal uteri from parous subjects) showed patterns of innervation similar to those of group 1 with the exception that 6 uteri demonstrated areas of nerve fiber proliferation (see below, group 4).…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mob.2002.130007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peripheral factors associated with painful endometriosis, such as increased eutopic uterine innervation and high peritoneal fluid concentrations of prostaglandins and other pro-inflammatory agents, are also found in women without endometriosis.

    “Peripheral factors associated with painful endometriosis are found in women without endometriosis, such as increased eutopic uterine innervation”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinn, M. J., & Kirk, N.
Affiliations
Hinchingbrooke Hospital (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
187
Issue
6
Pages
1515-1520
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024101376
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
uterine nerves, adenomyosis, chronic pelvic pain, hysterectomy, myometrium, neurovascular bundle, parity, protein gene product 9.5, uterine isthmus, nulliparous women, multiparous women, uterine pain
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Middle Aged, Myometrium, Nerve Fibers, Parity, Retrospective Studies, Uterus, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review