CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 203Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementRenal and Vascular Pathologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current results of open revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: A standard for comparison

Open access
Park, Woosup M., Cherry, Kenneth J., Chua, Heidi K., Clark, Rita C., Jenkins, Gregory, Harmsen, William S., Noel, Audra A., Panneton, Jean M., Bower, Thomas C., Hallett, John W., Gloviczki, Peter·2002·Journal of Vascular Surgery
DOI 10.1067/mva.2002.123753
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objective Questions remain concerning the optimal site of graft origin and the extent of revascularization necessary to achieve excellent results for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Endovascular therapy also is performed for CMI. These factors prompted us to review our results to provide a current standard.Methods Ninety-eight patients who underwent operation for CMI from 1989 to 1998 were reviewed. Patients with acute ischemia and arcuate ligament syndrome were excluded.Results Seventy-six women (78%) and 22 men (22%), with an average age of 66 years (range, 36 to 87 years), participated in the study. Abdominal pain was present in 95 patients (97%), and weight loss in 92 patients (94%). The superior mesenteric artery was severely diseased (70% to 99% stenosis or occlusion) in 90 patients (92%), the celiac artery in 81 patients (83%), and both arteries in 76 patients (78%). Bypass grafts were performed in 91 patients (93%), 77 antegrade and 14 retrograde. Of the other seven patients, five had endarterectomies, one reimplantation, and one patch angioplasty. Multivessel reconstruction was performed in 79 patients (81%), and single-vessel reconstruction in 19 (19%). Twelve patients had concomitant aortic reconstruction. Three early graft thromboses were seen. Five hospital deaths occurred (5.1%); one case had concomitant aortic reconstruction (1/12 versus 4/86; P = not significant). All five patients who died were older than 70 years (5/41 versus 0/57; P =.011). The median follow-up period was 1.9 years (range, 0 to 9.6 years). Follow-up was complete in all survivors. The 1-year, 5-year, and 8-year survival rates were 83%, 63%, and 55%, respectively. These rates were worse than the rates of the age-matched/gender-matched control subjects (P <.001). Survival was worse in patients greater than 70 years of age (P =.0013). Survival was unaffected by the number of vessels revascularized. The patients with retrograde grafts had decreased median survival rates (4.0 versus 5.7 years; P =.026), but they were older (75 versus 65 years; P =.0013). The 1-year and 5-year symptom-free survival rates were 95% and 92%, respectively. Symptoms recurred in six patients (6%): four had recurrent stenosis/occlusion and two had patent grafts. Symptom-free survival was unaffected by the number of vessels revascularized or by graft orientation.Conclusion Operation for CMI was successful for most patients, with low operative mortality and excellent long-term relief of symptoms. Selective concomitant aortic procedures did not increase mortality rates. The rate of symptomatic recurrences was not different for single-vessel versus multiple-vessel reconstructions or for antegrade versus retrograde grafts. Patients older than 70 years had increased operative mortality and decreased survival rates. Endovascular therapy may be appropriate for this subset of patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mva.2002.123753

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Park, W. M., Cherry, K. J., Chua, H. K., Clark, R. C., Jenkins, G., Harmsen, W. S., Noel, A. A., Panneton, J. M., Bower, T. C., Hallett, J. W., & Gloviczki, P.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
853-859
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1067/mva.2002.123753
OpenAlex
W2032949453
Cited by
203
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, open surgical revascularization, celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, endarterectomy, graft thrombosis, survival rate, endovascular treatment, elderly patients, in-hospital mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Mesenteric Arteries, Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion, Middle Aged, Reference Standards, Retrospective Studies, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review