The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses
Abstract
Remote sensing technology has great potential for acquisition of detailed and accurate land-use information for management and planning of urban regions. However, the determination of land-use data with high geometric and thematic accuracy is generally limited by the availability of adequate remote sensing data, in terms of spatial and temporal resolution, and digital image analysis techniques. This study introduces a methodology using information on image spatial form—landscape metrics—to describe urban land-use structures and land-cover changes that result from urban growth. The analysis is based on spatial analysis of land-cover structures mapped from digitally classified aerial photographs of the urban region Santa Barbara, CA. Landscape metrics were calculated for segmented areas of homogeneous urban land use to allow a further characterization of the land use of these areas. The results show a useful separation and characterization of three urban land-use types: commercial development, high-density residential, and low-density residential. Several important structural land-cover features were identified for this study. These were: the dominant general land cover (built up or vegetation), the housing density, the mean structure and plot size, and the spatial aggregation of built-up areas. For two test areas in the Santa Barbara region, changes (urban growth) in the urban spatial land-use structure can be described and quantified with landscape metrics. In order to discriminate more accurately between the three land-cover types of interest, the landscape metrics were further refined into what are termed ‘landscape metric signatures’ for the land-use categories. The analysis shows the importance of the spatial measurements as second-order image information that can contribute to more detailed mapping of urban areas and towards a more accurate characterization of spatial urban growth pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: A case study of Shanghai, China
Li, J., Song, C., Cao, L., Zhu, F., Meng, X., & Wu, J. (2011) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.008 · Cited by 1,120
The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change
Herold, M., Couclelis, H., & Clarke, K. C. (2005) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.12.001 · Cited by 622
Self-citationThe evolution of urban sprawl: Evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation
Irwin, E. G., & Bockstael, N. E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705527105 · Cited by 572
Hu, X., & Xu, H. (2018) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.006 · Cited by 533
Chen, G., Hay, G. J., Carvalho, L. M. T., & Wulder, M. A. (2012) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2011.648285 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Herold, M., Scepan, J., & Clarke, K. C.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1443-1458
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W1972477301
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a3496
- The paper
- Herold, M., Scepan, J., & Clarke, K. C. (2002). The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.