The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualizing the Political Ecology of Urban Infrastructures: Insights from Technology and Urban Studies
Abstract
The debate on urban sustainability has now been on the research agenda for a number of years. One element that has, however, been undertheorized and empirically understudied is the crucial importance of networked urban infrastructures for the ecological sustainability of cities. These infrastructures mediate resource flows and vitally shape environmental practices and sociotechnical innovation in cities. It is thus argued that we need adequate conceptual approaches which reflect the complex interdependencies between cities, networked infrastructures, and urban ecologies and which broaden our understanding of the ways we can develop, govern, and renew our infrastructures in cities in a sustainable way. Scrutinizing the relevant debates both in technology studies and in urban studies, the author reveals that none of the theoretical approaches discussed seems entirely suitable for conceptualizing these interdependencies and the requirements for the sustainable redesign of urban infrastructures. The author shows, however, how urban and technology studies might inspire, complement, and benefit each other in conceptualizing the urban political ecology of networked infrastructures. Combining elements of the different analytical approaches, it is argued, could create new opportunities for the empirical study of infrastructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Cited by
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Revisiting the urban politics of climate change
Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2013) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755797 · Cited by 656
Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions
Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003 · Cited by 522
Space and scale in socio-technical transitions
Raven, R., Schot, J., & Berkhout, F. (2012) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001 · Cited by 473
Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change
Rutherford, J., & Coutard, O. (2014) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098013500090 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Monstadt, J.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1924-1942
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W2108734321
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualizing the Political Ecology of Urban Infrastructures: Insights from Technology and Urban Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a4145
- The paper
- Monstadt, J. (2009). Conceptualizing the Political Ecology of Urban Infrastructures: Insights from Technology and Urban Studies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.