The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Green Economy and Sustainable Development: An Uneasy Balance?
Open accessAbstract
The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (or Rio+20) was conceived at a time of great concern for the health of the world economy. In this atmosphere ‘green economy’ was chosen as one of two central themes for the conference, building on a burgeoning body of literature on the green economy and growth. This research examines the relationship and influence between the double crisis and the rise of ‘greening’ as part of the solution. The aim is to understand what defines and distinguishes the proposals contained in twenty-four sources on the green economy (including policy documents by international agencies and think tanks, and research papers), and what is the meaning and implication of the rising greening agenda for sustainable development as it enters the 21st century. Through a systematic qualitative analysis of textual material, three categories of discourse that can illuminate the meaning and implication of greening are identified: ‘almost business as usual’, ‘greening’, and ‘all change’. An analysis of their relationship with Dryzek's classification of environmental discourse leads to the identification of three interrelated patterns: (1) scarcity and limits, (2) means and ends, and (3) reductionism and unity—which deepen our understanding of the tensions between emerging propositions. The patterns help explain the meaning and implications of greening for sustainable development, revealing an economisation and polarisation of discourses, the persisting weak interpretation of sustainable development, and a tension between the fixing or shifting of dominant socioeconomic paradigms that underpin its conceptualisation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time
Polanyi, K., Stiglitz, J. E., & Block, F. (1944) · Cited by 6,692
Great Transformation: Political and Economic Origins of our Time
Radaev, V. (2002) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2002-5-115-117 · Cited by 5,438
Climate change 2001: synthesis report
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4660 · Cited by 5,272
Vanoli, A. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1714428 · Cited by 3,278
Williams, R. (1961) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/will93760 · Cited by 3,220
An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science
Robbins, L. (1984) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-17510-9 · Cited by 3,217
The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses
Dryzek, J. S. (1997) · Cited by 3,013
Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
Fitoussi, J., Sen, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2011) · Cited by 2,887
Cited by
Ucal, M., & Xydis, G. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102210 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Bina, O.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1023-1047
- ISSN
- 0263-774X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3425
- OpenAlex
- W2087341478
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 59.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Green Economy and Sustainable Development: An Uneasy Balance? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/c1310j
- The paper
- Bina, O. (2013). The Green Economy and Sustainable Development: An Uneasy Balance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.