CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 234European Union Policy and GovernancePublic Policy and Administration ResearchAgricultural Economics and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Implementation of EU Environmental Policy; A Policy Problem without a Political Solution?

Jordan, A·1999·Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
DOI 10.1068/c170069
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Implementation lies at the ‘sharp end’ of the European Union (EU) environmental policy process. The success of the EU's policies must ultimately be judged by the impact they have on the ground, but despite many institutional initiatives, poor implementation remains a fact of life in Europe. In this paper the author investigates why the issue of poor implementation was neglected during the first decade of EU environmental policy, outlines the responsibilities and interests of the main actors involved in putting policies into effect, and discusses possible solutions to the well-publicised ‘gap’ between policy goals and outcomes. Implementation deficits will be difficult to eradicate completely because they serve to maintain the delicate ‘balance’ between governmental and supranational elements in the EU.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/c170069

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Anderson D, 1988, Boston College International Comparative Law Review, 11, 91
  2. Bjerregaard R, 1998, UKCEED Bulletin, 52, 5
  3. CEC, 1993, The Internal Market after 1992: Meeting the Challenge
  4. CEC, 1998, Agenda 2000: The Future for European Agriculture
  5. Clinton-Davis S, 1992, Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Legislation. Volume II—Evidence House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities, House of Lords paper 53–11, 200
  6. Cockfield A, 1994, The European Union
  7. 10.1080/09644019208414052 · DOI
  8. Crenson M A, 1971, The Un-politics of Air Pollution
  9. Docksey C, 1994, The European Commission, 117
  10. EEB, 1994, Your Rights Under EU Environmental Legislation
  11. ENDS, 1984, ENDS Report, 111, 9
  12. ENDS, 1998, ENDS Report, 277, 43
  13. Europe Environment, 1997, “Ministers debate EU law, voluntary accords and climate change”, 502, 5
  14. From J, 1993, Making Policy in Europe, 55
  15. Haigh N, 1992, Manual of Environmental Policy
  16. Haigh N, 1997, Manual of Environmental Policy
  17. Hogwood B, 1987, From Crisis to Complacency
  18. HOLSCEC, 1987, Fourth Environmental Action Programme House of Lords papers 25, House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities
  19. HOLSCEC, 1992, Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Legislation. Volume 1—Report
  20. HOLSCEC, 1992, Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Legislation. Volume II—Evidence House of Lords papers 53-II, House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities
  21. HOLSCEC, 1997, Community Environmental Law: Making it Work House of Lords papers 12, House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities
  22. Humphreys J, 1996, “A way through the woods: negotiating in the EU”
  23. Jordan A, 1997, unpublished PhD thesis
  24. Krämer L, 1989, Journal of the Regional Science Association, 137, 243
  25. Krämer L, 1996, Protecting the European Environment, 99
  26. Macrory R, 1992, Campaigners' Guide to Using EC Environmental Law
  27. Macrory R, 1997, The Impact of EC Environmental Law in the UK, 27
  28. OJ—Official Journal of the European Communities
  29. Pressman J, 1973, Implementation
  30. Pressman J, 1984, Implementation
  31. Rehbinder E, 1985, Integration through Law, 137
  32. Rometsch D, 1996, The EU and Member States
  33. Siedentopf H, 1988, Making European Policies Work
  34. Somsen H, 1996, Protecting the European Environment, 135
  35. Wägenbaur R, 1990, Fordham International Law Journal, 14, 455
  36. Weiler J, 1988, 1992: One European Market?, 337
  37. Wilkinson D, 1994, “The state of reporting by the Commission in fulfilment of obligations contained in EC environmental legislation”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 234

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jordan, A.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Jordan, A
ORCID
Jordan, A
Venue
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1999-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
69-90
ISSN
  • 0263-774X (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3425
DOI
10.1068/c170069
OpenAlex
W2020080962
Cited by
229
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
61.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Environment and Planning C Government and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
Keywords
EU environmental policy, policy implementation, implementation deficit, policy gaps, supranational governance, EU institutions, policy actors, European Union

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review