The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis
Abstract
Observers of the European Community have criticized “intergovernmentalist” accounts for exaggerating the extent of member-state control over European integration. This article grounds these criticisms in a historical institutionalist analysis, stressing the need to study European integration as a process that unfolds over time. Losses of control result not only from the autonomous actions of supranational organizations, but from member-state preoccupation with short-term concerns, the ubiquity of unintended consequences, and the instability of member-state policy preferences. Once gaps in control emerge, change-resistant decision rules and sunk costs associated with societal adaptations make it difficult for member states to reassert their authority. Brief examination of the evolution of EC social policy suggests the limitations of treating the EC as an instrument facilitating collective action among sovereign states. Rather, integration should be viewed as a path-dependent process producing a fragmented but discernible multitiered European polity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As social actors make commitments based on existing institutions and policies, the cost of exit from existing arrangements generally rises dramatically.
“As social actors make commitments based on existing institu tions and policies, the cost of exit from existing arrangements generally rises dramatically (Pierson 1996).”
From Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics (2000) · cites this paper as Pierson 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · see citing works
Self-citationHISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Thelen, K. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · Cited by 3,409 · see citing works
Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output <i>and</i> ‘Throughput’
Schmidt, V. A. (2013) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x · Cited by 1,213 · see citing works
Koenig, M. (2007) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/13691830701432756 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
- Authors
- PIERSON, P.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- PIERSON, PAUL
- ORCID
- PIERSON, PAUL
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-163
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2070677020
- Cited by
- 1,634
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 183.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European and International Law Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
- Keywords
- European integration, intergovernmentalism, historical institutionalism, path dependence, European Community, supranational institutions, unintended consequences, policy preferences, decision rules, sunk costs, social policy, European polity, collective action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review