The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generalization across View in Face Memory and Face Matching
Abstract
While a change in view is considered to be one of the most damaging manipulations for facial identification, this phenomenon has been measured traditionally with tasks that confound perceptual processes with recognition memory. This study explored facial identification with a pairwise matching task to determine whether view generalization is possible when memory factors are minimised. Experiment 1 showed that the detrimental view effect in recognition memory is attenuated in face matching. Moreover, analysis of individual differences revealed that some observers can identify faces across view with perfect accuracy. This was replicated in Experiment 2, which also showed that view generalization is unaffected when only the internal facial features are shown. These results indicate that the view effect in recognition memory does not arise from data limits, whereby faces contain insufficient visual information to allow identification across views. Instead, these findings point to resource limits, within observers, that hamper such person identification in recognition memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sample size in Experiment 2 was based on past research using a face matching paradigm.
“Sample size was again based on past research using a face matching paradigm (Dowsett & Burton, 2015; Estudillo & Bindemann, 2014).”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Estudillo & Bindemann, 2014
Sample size in Experiment 1 was based on past research using a face matching paradigm.
“Sample size was based on past research using a face matching paradigm (Dowsett & Burton, 2015; Estudillo & Bindemann, 2014).”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Estudillo & Bindemann, 2014
Face matching performance declines when task demands are increased, such as when viewpoint varies between the two images or there are long time periods between image captures.
“and when task demands are increased (e.g., viewpoint varies in the two images: Estudillo & Bindemann, 2014; or there are long time periods between the two image captures: White et al., 2014).”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Estudillo & Bindemann, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1002/acp.2968 · DOI · Paper page
- Benton A. L., 1983, Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment
- 10.1002/acp.2970 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0029635 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/p7008 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280244000168 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · DOI
- 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/p3335 · DOI
- 10.1080/09541440340000439 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.010 · DOI
- 10.1068/p080431 · DOI
- Endo M., 1984, Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 43, 23
- 10.1037/a0027393 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00785-8 · DOI
- 10.1068/p230065 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0379 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.2963 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.2009.21080 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.66.5.651 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01558-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.2967 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.77 · DOI
- 10.1080/20445911.2012.739153 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03193433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03193954 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0013464 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.2965 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/17470218.2011.575228 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00042-X · DOI
- 10.1038/384404a0 · DOI
- 10.1068/p3101no · DOI
- 10.1068/p2901 · DOI
- 10.1068/p140737 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls
Bate, S., Bennetts, R., Murray, E., & Portch, E. (2020) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669520944420 · Cited by 12
A criterion-placement theory of face matching
Baker, K. A., Mondloch, C. J., Hancock, P. J. B., & Bindemann, M. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106319 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Estudillo, A. J., & Bindemann, M.
- Affiliations
- School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
- Venue
- i-Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 589-601
- ISSN
- 2041-6695
- PMC
- PMC4411982
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review