The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis
Abstract
A hypothesis is put forward of how global patterns of optical flow, as discussed by Gibson, Johansson, and others, could be processed by relatively simple physiological mechanisms. It is suggested that there may exist motion-sensitive cells in the visual system which operate on the optical flow over the retina, and, in so doing, structure the visual field in terms of distinct surfaces that move and/or lie at varying distances from the observer. First, concepts of static and dynamic perspective relative to a sphere centered about the eye are developed, partly on the basis of the work of Gordon. It is pointed out that the velocity flow pattern has a very simple form making it amenable to analysis by relatively low-level mechanisms. Next a higher-order variable of optical flow, the ‘convexity’, is defined; under the assumption of a rigid environment, convexity is shown to be related to relative depth. It is then postulated that velocity-sensitive cells having center—surround organization could be linked in such a way as to define a higher-order cell, the convexity cell, having functional properties that make it sensitive to the convexity function. The response profile of a layer of such cells would provide an efficient structuring of the visual field in terms of distinct optical surfaces. Relevant evidence is briefly discussed. Lastly, the optical flow patterns corresponding to rotations of the observer are considered. It is shown that the convexity cell is insensitive to rotations and in consequence responds in an invariant fashion to aspects of the optical flow which are related to the surrounding environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Perception of the Visual World
Gibson, J. J. (1951) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419017 · Cited by 1,145
Cited by
Horn, B. K. P., & Schunck, B. G. (1981) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(81)90024-2 · Cited by 10,312
Visual space perception and visually directed action.
Loomis, J. M., Silva, J. A. D., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.906 · Cited by 698
Self-citationAllman, J., Miezin, F., & McGuinness, E. (1985) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p140105 · Cited by 640
Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons
Sun, H., & Frost, B. J. (1998) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/1110 · Cited by 394
The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field
Mckee, S. P., & Nakayama, K. (1984) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90140-8 · Cited by 375
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakayama, K., & Loomis, J. M.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-80
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W2041880269
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/p030063
- The paper
- Nakayama, K., & Loomis, J. M. (1974). Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p030063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.