Cited by 9Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integration

Adaptation to Visual Displacement: Contribution of Proprioceptive, Visual, and Attentional Factors

Mather, Jennifer A, Lackner, James R·1981·Perception

Abstract

A study is reported of the sensory and oculomotor factors that influence adaptation to visual displacement when only sight of the hand and of a target light is permitted. Ten subjects each participated in five counterbalanced sessions in which the relative contributions to adaptation of limb proprioception, oculomotor pursuit, retinal image displacement, and attention were determined. Recordings of eye position were taken throughout the sessions. A discordance between the visual direction of the hand and the proprioceptively specified position of the hand was essential but not sufficient for adaptation to occur. When such a discordance was present adaptation was enhanced by improving position sense of the arm by moving it passively, maximizing accuracy of visual tracking, and focusing attention on the hand. Attentional factors played a smaller part than has been reported for exposure situations involving error feedback about limb position. Eye-movement recordings showed that tracking the passively moved hand visually was vastly superior to tracking a target light undergoing comparable motion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/p100367

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When active and passive exposure conditions are equated in terms of attention demands, significant differences are typically absent or minimal.

    “When active and passive exposure conditions are equated in terms of attention demands—what the subjects are instructed to do—significant differences are typically absent or minimal Lackner 1981, Mather and Lackner 1981).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Mather and Lackner 1981

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mather, J. A., & Lackner, J. R.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Venue
Perception
Published
1981-08
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
367-374
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W2010286146
Cited by
9
References
36
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
proprioception, visual object tracking, attention, retinal image displacement, limb position sense, passive limb movement, eye movements, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Ocular, Adult, Attention, Eye Movements, Female, Hand, Humans, Kinesthesis, Male, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review