Cited by 34Visual perception and processing mechanismsVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsMotor Control and Adaptation

Effects of Simulated Viewpoint Jitter on Visually Induced Postural Sway

Palmisano, Stephen, Pinniger, Gavin J, Ash, April, Steele, Julie R·2009·Perception

Abstract

In this study we examined the effects of simulated horizontal and vertical viewpoint jitter on the vection and postural sway induced by radial patterns of optic flow. During each trial, observers were exposed sequentially to 20 s periods of radially expanding flow, radially contracting flow, and static visual scenes. For half the trials, simulated viewpoint jitter was added to the radially expanding/contracting optic flow patterns. In experiment 1, we found that, while this jitter increased the backward postural sway induced by radial expansion, it actually decreased forward postural sway induced by radial contraction. However, in experiment 2 we found that jitter increased both the forward and backward vection induced by radially expanding and contracting flow patterns. We conclude that the processes involved in postural control are more sensitive to the sensory conflicts generated by viewpoint jitter than those involved in the perception of self-motion, and that the observed asymmetries in forward and backward sway are ecological in origin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/p6159

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Palmisano et al. (2009) found that adding visual jitter to a stimulus that created forward vection increased sensory conflict but resulted in stronger vection; no sickness data were reported.

    “Support for this assumption is also provided by Palmisano et al. (2009), who added visual jitter to a stimulus that created forward vection. Despite increasing the sensory conflict by adding the visual jitter, results showed stronger vection than the same visual stimulus without jitter. However, no sickness data were reported in this study.”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Palmisano et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmisano, S., Pinniger, G. J., Ash, A., & Steele, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Palmisano, Stephen
Venue
Perception
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
442-453
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W2086872653
Cited by
34
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
vection, postural sway, optical flow, radial expansion, radial contraction, self-motion perception, sensory conflict, postural control, visual-vestibular interaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Illusions, Kinesthesis, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review