Cited by 13Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

A Perception–Action Strategy for Hummingbirds

Open access
Delafield-Butt, Jonathan, Galler, Andreas, Schögler, Benjaman, Lee, David N·2010·Perception

Abstract

Many human and animal tasks are thought to be controlled with the τ informational variable. It is widely accepted that controlling the rate of change of τ (tau) during decelerative tasks, such as when braking or landing, is one common perceptual control strategy. However, many tasks require accelerating before decelerating to a goal, such as reaching. An advancement of τ theory shows how a single action formula may be used to control the full action unit from initiation to peak velocity, and to rest at the goal, with the same perceptual τ information as before and accounting for the same decelerative kinematics as before. Here, we test the theory against data from high-speed video of a hummingbird flying to its flower feeder. We find that the theory accounts for 97% of the variance in the data, and thus supports it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/p6708

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delafield-Butt, J., Galler, A., Schögler, B., & Lee, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Østerfarimagsgade 2A, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • University of Klagenfurt (AT)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Lee, David N
Venue
Perception
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1172-1174
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W2145131091
Cited by
13
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
perception-action coupling, tau theory, hummingbirds, flight kinematics, acceleration and deceleration, reaching behavior, high-speed video
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Birds, Deceleration, Flight, Animal, Motion Perception, Movement, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review