Impact of streaming “fast track” emergency department patients
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Fast track systems to stream emergency department (ED) patients with low acuity conditions have been introduced widely, resulting in reduced waiting times and lengths of stay for these patients. We aimed to prospectively assess the impact on patient flows of a fast track system implemented in the emergency department of an Australian tertiary adult teaching hospital which deals with relatively few low acuity patients. Methods: During the 12-week trial period, patients in Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) categories 3, 4 and 5 who were likely to be discharged were identified at triage and assessed and treated in a separate fast track area by ED medical and nursing staff rostered to work exclusively in the area. Results: The fast track area managed 21.6% of all patients presenting during its hours of operation. There was a 20.3% (?18 min; 95%CI, ?26 min to ?10 min) relative reduction in the average waiting time and an 18.0% (?41 min; 95%CI, ?52 min to ?30 min) relative reduction in the average length of stay for all discharged patients compared with the same period the previous year. Compared with the 12-week period before the fast track trial, there was a 3.4% (?2.1 min; 95%CI, ?8 min to 4 min) relative reduction in the average waiting time and a 9.7% (?20 min; 95%CI, ?31 min to ?9 min) relative reduction in the average length of stay for all discharged patients. There was no increase in the average waiting time for admitted patients. This was despite major increases in throughput and access block in the study period. Conclusion: Streaming fast track patients in the emergency department of an Australian tertiary adult teaching hospital can reduce waiting times and length of stay for discharged patients without increasing waiting times for admitted patients, even in an ED with few low acuity patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some process changes resembled those already advised or attempted for EDs, such as "fast-track" streaming.
“Some process changes resembled those already advised or attempted for EDs, such as “fast-track” streaming [87].”
From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cooke, M. W. (2002) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emj.19.1.28 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Fernandes, C. M. B., Price, A., & Christenson, J. M. (1997) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0736-4679(97)00030-9 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
A paradigm shift in the nature of care provision in emergency departments
Taylor, D. M. (2004) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emj.2004.017640 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Fernandes, C. M. B., Christenson, J. M., & Price, A. (1996) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03430.x · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Fast track: Urgent care within a teaching hospital emergency department: Can it work?
Meislin, H. W., Coates, S. A., Cyr, J., & Valenzuela, T. (1988) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80235-x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Patient satisfaction with physician assistants (PAs) in an ED fast track
Counselman, F. L., Graffeo, C. A., & Hill, J. T. (2000) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1053/ajem.2000.16301 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Fast Track and the Pediatric Emergency Department: Resource Utilization and Patient Outcomes
Hampers, L. C., Cha, S., Gutglass, D. J., Binns, H. J., & Krug, S. E. (1999) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00119.x · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Fast tracking” patients in an urban pediatric emergency department
Simon, H. K., McLario, D. J., Daily, R., Lanese, C., Castillo, J., & Wright, J. A. (1996) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0735-6757(96)90166-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Societal savings by “fast tracking” lower acuity patients in an urban pediatric emergency department
Simon, H. K., Ledbetter, D. A., & Wright, J. A. (1997) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90154-6 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Fast track in the emergency department: A one-year experience with nurse practitioners
Wright, S. W., Erwin, T., Blanton, D. M., et al. (1992) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/0736-4679(92)90345-t · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Mw, A., Wells, J. E., Cooper, K., et al. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Beales, J. (1997) · Accident and Emergency Nursing · doi:10.1016/s0965-2302(97)90082-5 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Docimo, A. B., Pronovost, P. J., Davis, R. O., et al. (2000) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement · doi:10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26042-2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Making see and treat work for patients and staff
Parker, L. (2004) · Emergency Nurse · doi:10.7748/en.11.9.16.s13 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fernandes CM, Christenson JM. Use of continuous quality improvement to facilitate patient flow through Improving the Processes of Care the triage and fast-track areas of an emergency department. J Emerg Med 1995; 13: 847-55.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review
Holden, R. J. (2011) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Optimizing Emergency Department Front-End Operations
Wiler, J. L., Gentle, C., Halfpenny, J. M., Heins, A., Mehrotra, A., Mikhail, M. G., & Fite, D. (2010) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.021 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Streaming by case complexity: evaluation of a model for emergency department fast track
Ieraci, S., Digiusto, E., Sonntag, P., Dann, L., & Fox, D. (2008) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01087.x · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- O'Brien, D., Williams, A., Blondell, K., & Jelinek, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU)
- ORCID
- Jelinek, George A
- Venue
- Australian Health Review
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-532
- ISSN
- 0156-5788 (ISSN-L)
- 1449-8944
- OpenAlex
- W2021534809
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Australian Health Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Keywords
- low-acuity patients, patient flow, emergency department waiting times, length of hospital stay, Australasian Triage Scale, emergency department throughput, access block, emergency department discharge
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Triage, Western Australia, Efficiency, Organizational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
