Cited by 26Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Stepped care mental health service in Australian primary care: codesign and feasibility study

Open access
Anderson, Josephine, O’Moore, Kathleen, Faraj, Mariam, Proudfoot, Judith·2020·Australian Health Review

Abstract

Objective: In 2015, the Australian Government introduced several mental health reforms, including the requirement that Primary Health Networks (PHNs) provide stepped care services for Australians with mental health needs such as anxiety and depression. This paper reports on the development and feasibility study of StepCare, an online stepped mental healthcare service in general practice that screens patients, provides immediate feedback to patients and general practitioners (GPs), transmits stepped treatment recommendations to GPs and monitors patients’ progress, including notification of deterioration. Methods: The present codesign and feasibility study in one PHN examined: (1) the acceptability and feasibility of StepCare to GPs, practice staff and patients; (2) the impact of StepCare on clinical practice; and (3) the barriers to and facilitators of implementation. Results: Thirty-two GPs, 22 practice staff and 418 patients participated in the study. Overall, patients, practice staff and GPs found StepCare acceptable and feasible, commending its privacy, the mental health screening, monitoring and feedback. They also made suggestions for service improvements. GPs reported that StepCare helped with their identification and management of patients with common mental health issues. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that StepCare may be acceptable and feasible in Australian general practice, helping GPs identify and manage common mental health problems in their patients. The study provides implications for policy and practice, and points the way to future translational research into stepped mental health care. What is known about the topic?: Depression and anxiety are common illnesses in primary care and GPs are ideally placed to implement stepped care approaches enabling early detection and accessible, effective care. What does this paper add?: Developed in and for general practice, StepCare is the first fully integrated stepped approach to primary mental health care in Australia. As a first step in a translational research program evaluating the effectiveness of StepCare, this paper reports data regarding the feasibility and acceptability of the service. What are the implications for practitioners?: Integrated into the workflow of general practice, StepCare is an online service that helps GPs detect new cases of depression and anxiety, provide evidence-based stepped care treatments and monitor patients’ progress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/ah19078

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Web-based interventions can be successfully integrated into routine primary care.

    “They can be successfully integrated into routine primary care [24,25]”

    From Web-Based Interventions to Help Australian Adults Address Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation, and General Mental Well-being: Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction describes the online StepCare service as integrated into the day-to-day workflow of general practice, and the Discussion reports generally positive feasibility findings (page numbers unavailable). But this was a preliminary study of one service in Australian general practices; it does not establish that web-based interventions generally can be successfully integrated into routine primary care. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, J., O’Moore, K., Faraj, M., & Proudfoot, J.
Affiliations
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • BCentral and Eastern Sydney Primary Health Network, Coward Street, Mascot, NSW, Australia. Email: m.faraj@cesphn.com.au
Corresponding author
Anderson, Josephine
Venue
Australian Health Review
Published
2019-10-30
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
873-879
ISSN
  • 0156-5788 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-8944
OpenAlex
W2982391321
Cited by
26
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Health Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
stepped care, primary care mental health, depression, anxiety, general practice, primary health networks, mental health screening, co-design, feasibility, acceptability, implementation barriers and facilitators, early detection of mental health problems
MeSH terms
Australia, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Mental Health Services, Primary Health Care, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review