The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems
Abstract
New tools derived from advances in molecular biology have not been widely adopted in plant breeding for complex traits because of the inability to connect information at gene level to the phenotype in a manner that is useful for selection. In this study, we explored whether physiological dissection and integrative modelling of complex traits could link phenotype complexity to underlying genetic systems in a way that enhanced the power of molecular breeding strategies. A crop and breeding system simulation study on sorghum, which involved variation in 4 key adaptive traits—phenology, osmotic adjustment, transpiration efficiency, stay-green—and a broad range of production environments in north-eastern Australia, was used. The full matrix of simulated phenotypes, which consisted of 547 location–season combinations and 4235 genotypic expression states, was analysed for genetic and environmental effects. The analysis was conducted in stages assuming gradually increased understanding of gene-to-phenotype relationships, which would arise from physiological dissection and modelling. It was found that environmental characterisation and physiological knowledge helped to explain and unravel gene and environment context dependencies in the data. Based on the analyses of gene effects, a range of marker-assisted selection breeding strategies was simulated. It was shown that the inclusion of knowledge resulting from trait physiology and modelling generated an enhanced rate of yield advance over cycles of selection. This occurred because the knowledge associated with component trait physiology and extrapolation to the target population of environments by modelling removed confounding effects associated with environment and gene context dependencies for the markers used. Developing and implementing this gene-to-phenotype capability in crop improvement requires enhanced attention to phenotyping, ecophysiological modelling, and validation studies to test the stability of candidate genetic regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cooper, M., & DeLacy, I. H. (1994) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01240919 · Cited by 349
Mapping As You Go: An Effective Approach for Marker‐Assisted Selection of Complex Traits
Podlich, D. W., Winkler, C. R., & Cooper, M. (2004) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1560 · Cited by 169
Self-citationGene-to-phenotype models and complex trait genetics
Cooper, M., Podlich, D. W., & Smith, O. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar05154 · Cited by 104
Self-citationChapman, S. C., Cooper, M., & Hammer, G. L. (2002) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar01070 · Cited by 103
Self-citationTardieu, F., Reymond, M., Muller, B., Granier, C., Simonneau, T., Sadok, W., & Welcker, C. (2005) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar05156 · Cited by 71
Cited by
APSIM – evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation
Holzworth, D. P., Huth, N. I., deVoil, P. G., Zurcher, E. J., Herrmann, N. I., McLean, G., Chenu, K., van Oosterom, E. J., Snow, V., Murphy, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009 · Cited by 1,756
Self-citationQuantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction
Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Podlich, D., Totir, L. R., Baumgarten, A., Hausmann, N. J., Wright, D., & Graham, G. (2014) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp14007 · Cited by 411
Self-citationModels for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants
Hammer, G., Cooper, M., Tardieu, F., Welch, S., Walsh, B., van Eeuwijk, F., Chapman, S., & Podlich, D. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.006 · Cited by 415
Self-citationAdapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops
Hammer, G. L., van Oosterom, E., McLean, G., Chapman, S. C., Broad, I., Harland, P., & Muchow, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq095 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammer, G. L., Chapman, S., van Oosterom, E., & Podlich, D. W.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2005-09-28
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 947-960
- ISSN
- 0004-9409 (ISSN-L)
- 1444-9838
- OpenAlex
- W2034664823
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ar05157
- The paper
- Hammer, G. L., Chapman, S., van Oosterom, E., & Podlich, D. W. (2005). Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/ar05157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.