The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses
Abstract
With a view to understanding the basis of cultivar differences in yield under drought, a wide range of cereal cultivars representing durum wheats (Triticum turgidum L.), triticales (X Tritosecale Wittmack), barleys (Hordeum vulgare), and especially tall and dwarf bread wheats (T. aestivum L.) were studied in field experiments in north-western Mexico over three seasons. Drought was created in this rain-free environment by permanently terminating irrigation at various stages before anthesis. Control treatments were well watered throughout the growing period. Detailed measurements of plant water status, leaf area and dry matter production, anthesis date, yield components and grain yield were made. This paper presents primarily the grain yield data. Drought levels were such that the mean yield of all cultivars under drought ranged from 37 to 86% of control yield, corresponding to irrigation cut-offs varying from 69 days before mean anthesis date to only 10 days before. In each experiment the grain yield under drought showed highly significant cultivar differences, which appeared consistent between years. Yields were adjusted for drought escape by using a correction factor which ranged from 2.9 to 8.5 g/m2 per day advance in flowering, being greater in experiments with less severe drought. The demonstration of linear relationships between cultivar yield and drought intensity, as indicated by the mean yield of some or all cultivars, prompted the consideration of cultivar yield under drought as the function of yield potential (Yp, yield without drought), drought susceptibility index (S), and intensity of drought. The cultivar groups showing lowest S values (most droughtresistant) were tall bread wheats and barleys; dwarf bread wheats were intermediate, and durum wheats and triticales were the most susceptible. However, because dwarf wheats have a higher yield potential (Yp) than tall bread wheats, it is suggested that, as a group, tall bread wheats would outyield dwarf wheats only under very severe drought. Also there was considerable within-group variability of S and Yp. Cultivar S values were consistent across experiments. Yield responses of tall and dwarf bread wheat groups obtained in these experiments agreed with those seen in extensive international trials under dryland conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crop Water Deficits: A Decade of Progress
Turner, N. C. (1986) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60464-2 · Cited by 438
Ribaut, J.-M., Jiang, C., Gonzalez-de-Leon, D., Edmeades, G. O., & Hoisington, D. A. (1997) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s001220050492 · Cited by 437
Salt stress under the scalpel – dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance
Morton, M. J. L., Awlia, M., Al‐Tamimi, N., Saade, S., Pailles, Y., Negrão, S., & Tester, M. (2019) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.14189 · Cited by 373
He, F., Pasam, R., Shi, F., Kant, S., Keeble-Gagnere, G., Kay, P., Forrest, K., Fritz, A., Hucl, P., Wiebe, K., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0382-2 · Cited by 357
Genome-wide association mapping of salinity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa)
Kumar, V., Singh, A., Mithra, S. V. A., Krishnamurthy, S. L., Parida, S. K., Jain, S., Tiwari, K. K., Kumar, P., Rao, A. R., Sharma, S. K., et al. (2015) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsu046 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, R., & Maurer, R.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1978-10-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 897-912
- ISSN
- 0004-9409 (ISSN-L)
- 1444-9838
- OpenAlex
- W1985308880
- Cited by
- 2,295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ar9780897
- The paper
- Fischer, R., & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/ar9780897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.