The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research note : Can decreased transpiration limit plant nitrogen acquisition in elevated CO 2 ?
Abstract
N acquisition often lags behind accelerated C gain in plants exposed to CO2-enriched atmospheres. To help resolve the causes of this lag, we considered its possible link with stomatal closure, a common first-order response to elevated CO2 that can decrease transpiration. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that declines in transpiration, and hence mass flow of soil solution, can decrease delivery of mobile N to the root and thereby limit plant N acquisition. We altered transpiration by manipulating relative humidity (RH) and atmospheric [CO2]. During a 7-d period, we grew potted cottonwood ( Populus deltoides Bartr.) trees in humidified (76% RH) and non-humidified (43% RH) glasshouses ventilated with either CO2-enriched or non-enriched air (~1000 vs ~380 µmol mol–1). We monitored effects of elevated humidity and/or CO2 on stomatal conductance, whole-plant transpiration, plant biomass gain, and N accumulation. To facilitate the latter, NO3– enriched in 15N (5 atom%) was added to all pots at the outset of the experiment. Transpiration and 15N accumulation decreased when either CO2 or humidity were elevated. The disparity between N accumulation and accelerated C gain in elevated CO2 led to a 19% decrease in shoot N concentration relative to ambient CO2. Across all treatments, 15N gain was positively correlated with root mass ( P <0.0001), and a significant portion of the remaining variation (44%) was positively related to transpiration per unit root mass. At a given humidity, transpiration per unit leaf area was positively related to stomatal conductance. Thus, declines in plant N concentration and/or content under CO2 enrichment may be attributable in part to associated decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: A review and perspectives
Sardans, J., Rivas-Ubach, A., & Peñuelas, J. (2012) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.08.002 · Cited by 685
Taub, D. R., & Wang, X. (2008) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00754.x · Cited by 438
BUCKLEY, T. N., & ADAMS, M. A. (2011) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02228.x · Cited by 57
Low vapour pressure deficit affects nitrogen nutrition and foliar metabolites in silver birch
Lihavainen, J., Ahonen, V., Keski-Saari, S., Kontunen-Soppela, S., Oksanen, E., & Keinänen, M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erw218 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, E. P., Erickson, J. E., & Kruger, E. L.
- Venue
- Functional Plant Biology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2002-07-20
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1115-1120
- ISSN
- 1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-4416
- OpenAlex
- W1492921483
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research note : Can decreased transpiration limit plant nitrogen acquisition in elevated CO 2 ? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/fp02007
- The paper
- McDonald, E. P., Erickson, J. E., & Kruger, E. L. (2002). Research note : Can decreased transpiration limit plant nitrogen acquisition in elevated CO 2 ? Functional Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1071/fp02007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.