The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why are Nitrogen Concentrations in Plant Tissues Lower under Elevated CO2? A Critical Examination of the Hypotheses
Abstract
Plants grown under elevated atmospheric [CO 2] typically have decreased tissue concentrations of N compared with plants grown under current ambient [CO 2]. The physiological mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon have not been definitely established, although a considerable number of hypotheses have been advanced to account for it. In this review we discuss and critically evaluate these hypotheses. One contributing factor to the decreases in tissue N concentrations clearly is dilution of N by increased photosynthetic assimilation of C. In addition, studies on intact plants show strong evidence for a general decrease in the specific uptake rates (uptake per unit mass or length of root) of N by roots under elevated CO 2. This decreased root uptake appears likely to be the result both of decreased N demand by shoots and of decreased ability of the soil‐root system to supply N. The best‐supported mechanism for decreased N supply is a decrease in transpiration‐driven mass flow of N in soils due to decreased stomatal conductance at elevated CO 2, although some evidence suggests that altered root system architecture may also play a role. There is also limited evidence suggesting that under elevated CO 2, plants may exhibit increased rates of N loss through volatilization and/or root exudation, further contributing to lowering tissue N concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants
(1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-473542-2.x5000-7 · Cited by 19,181
Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x · Cited by 3,624
AINSWORTH, E. A., & ROGERS, A. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x · Cited by 2,303
MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2?
Drake, B. G., Gonzàlez-Meler, M. A., & Long, S. P. (1997) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609 · Cited by 1,925
Soil Nutrient Bioavailability—A Mechanistic Approach
KAMPRATH, E. J. (1985) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-198508000-00012 · Cited by 1,576
Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach
Barber, S. A. (1984) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 1,560
A meta-analysis of elevated CO 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology
Curtis, P. S., & Wang, X. (1998) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050381 · Cited by 1,349
Self-citationTreseder, K. K. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01159.x · Cited by 1,246
Poorter, H., & Nagel, O. (2000) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp99173_co · Cited by 1,234
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: A review and perspectives
Sardans, J., Rivas-Ubach, A., & Peñuelas, J. (2012) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.08.002 · Cited by 685
Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15375 · Cited by 592
Metabolomics for Plant Improvement: Status and Prospects
Kumar, R., Bohra, A., Pandey, A. K., Pandey, M. K., & Kumar, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01302 · Cited by 328
Soares, J. C., Santos, C. S., Carvalho, S. M. P., Pintado, M. M., & Vasconcelos, M. W. (2019) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04229-0 · Cited by 319
Thompson, M., Gamage, D., Hirotsu, N., Martin, A., & Seneweera, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00578 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Taub, D. R., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-23
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1365-1374
- ISSN
- 0577-7496 (ISSN-L)
- 1672-9072
- 1744-7909
- OpenAlex
- W2169908654
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why are Nitrogen Concentrations in Plant Tissues Lower under Elevated CO2? A Critical Examination of the Hypotheses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00754.x
- The paper
- Taub, D. R., & Wang, X. (2008). Why are Nitrogen Concentrations in Plant Tissues Lower under Elevated CO2? A Critical Examination of the Hypotheses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00754.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.