Cited by 84Light effects on plantsPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control

Monochromatic red light during plant growth decreases the size and improves the functionality of stomata in chrysanthemum

Open access
Seif, Mehdi, Aliniaeifard, Sasan, Arab, Mostafa, Mehrjerdi, Mahboobeh Zare, Shomali, Aida, Fanourakis, Dimitrios, Li, Tao, Woltering, Ernst·2021·Functional Plant Biology

Abstract

Light emitting diodes (LEDs) now enable precise light quality control. Prior to commercialisation however, the plant response to the resultant light quality regime ought to be addressed. The response was examined here in chrysanthemum by evaluating growth, chlorophyll fluorescence (before and following water deficit), as well as stomatal anatomy (density, size, pore dimensions and aperture heterogeneity) and closing ability. Plants were grown under blue (B), red (R), a mixture of R (70%) and B (RB), or white (W; 41% B, 39% intermediate spectrum, 20% R) light LEDs. Although R light promoted growth, it also caused leaf deformation (epinasty) and disturbed the photosynthetic electron transport system. The largest stomatal size was noted following growth under B light, whereas the smallest under R light. The largest stomatal density was observed under W light. Monochromatic R light stimulated both the rate and the degree of stomatal closure in response to desiccation compared with the other light regimes. We conclude that stomatal size is mainly controlled by the B spectrum, whereas a broader spectral range is important for determining stomatal density. Monochromatic R light enhanced stomatal ability to regulate water loss upon desiccation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/fp20280

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sampling for stomatal morphology was done 3 h after the start of the light period because this time is adequate for plants to open stomata and reach a steady-state stomatal conductance.

    “Sampling was done 3 h after the start of the light period in the Phytotron, simultaneously under different light spectra, because this time is adequate for plants following experiencing the dark period to open stomata and reach a steady-state stomatal conductance (Seif et al., 2021).”

    From Growth, photosynthetic function, and stomatal characteristics of Persian walnut explants in vitro under different light spectra (2023) · cites this paper as Seif et al., 2021

    The available Abstract (page not specified) says the study evaluated stomatal anatomy and closing ability, but it gives no sampling time or reason for choosing one. Searches for three hours after light onset, stomatal conductance, and steady state returned no passage addressing whether stomata had opened after the dark period. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seif, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Arab, M., Mehrjerdi, M. Z., Shomali, A., Fanourakis, D., Li, T., & Woltering, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Hellenic Mediterranean University (GR)
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Aliniaeifard, Sasan
  • Fanourakis, Dimitrios
Venue
Functional Plant Biology
Published
2021-01-18
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
515-528
ISSN
  • 1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-4416
OpenAlex
W3122609511
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Functional Plant Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Keywords
blue light, light quality, light-emitting diodes, chrysanthemum, stomatal size, stomatal density, stomatal aperture, stomatal closure, desiccation stress, drought stress, chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthetic electron transport, epinasty, leaf deformation, plant growth
MeSH terms
Electron Transport, Light, Photosynthesis, Plant Leaves, Chrysanthemum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review