The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Breeding Cycle of the Female Humpback Whale, Megaptera nodosa (Bonnaterre)
Abstract
The gestation period in the humpback whale is of almost 12 months' duration, most conceptions occurring early in August with parturition at the beginning of the following August. The modal length of calves at birth is 14 ft. The sex ratio at birth is 51.4 per cent. males to 48.6 per cent. females. Twin foetuses are occasionally recorded. There is no preference towards either right or left ovary or uterine cornu with regard to ovulation or pregnancy. The breaking of the umbilical cord at birth is described. The histological appearances of the mammary gland during advanced pregnancy and during lactation are described and illustrated. Upon the evidence presented it is concluded that lactation in this species extends over 104 months, suckling generally commencing in mid August and terminating at the end of the following June. The composition of the milk has been determined during various stages of lactation. Oestrous cycles rarely occur during pregnancy, but examples of ovulation following shortly after parturition, while the females are suckling their calves, are cited. It is shown that when the calf is lost at or soon after birth, oestrous cycles usually recommence at once. Where the calf is suckled for the normal period (10½ months) there is no anoestrous period following the end of lactation as oestrous cycles recommence in July, immediately after (occasionally just before) weaning at the end of June. Three types of breeding cycle are shown for the humpback whale. In the most common cycle, absence of the post-partum ovulation, or its occurrence without conception, results in one calf in 2 years. On the other hand, a successful postpartum ovulation results in two calves in 2 years. In the third type of cycle, loss of the first calf at or just after parturition is balanced by a second pregnancy succeeding immediately afterwards. This results in two pregnancies in 2 years with only one calf reared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large Scale Changes over 19 Years in Songs of Humpback Whales in Bermuda
Payne, K., & Payne, R. (1985) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1985.tb00118.x · Cited by 310
The social and reproductive biology of Humpback Whales: an ecological perspective
CLAPHAM, P. J. (1996) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1996.tb00145.x · Cited by 286
Interactions between singing Hawaiian humpback whales and conspecifics nearby
Tyack, P. (1981) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00300822 · Cited by 286
Specific foetal growth rates of cetaceans
Frazer, J. F. D., & Huggett, A. S. G. (1973) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb04656.x · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Chittleborough, R.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1958-03-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0067-1940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062066965
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Breeding Cycle of the Female Humpback Whale, Megaptera nodosa (Bonnaterre). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/mf9580001
- The paper
- Chittleborough, R. (1958). The Breeding Cycle of the Female Humpback Whale, Megaptera nodosa (Bonnaterre). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf9580001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.