The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Can shark resources be harvested sustainably? A question revisited with a review of shark fisheries
Abstract
Sharks and other chondrichthyans are often described as long lived, slow growing and producing few offspring. These biological characteristics, together with the common assumption that recruitment is directly related to stock, and pessimistic stock prognoses obtained from application of demographic analysis, have led to doubts that sharks can be harvested sustainably. Developed over the past 40 or so years from studies of only a few shark species, these doubts have been reinforced by declining catch rates in industrial, artisanal and recreational fisheries and in fishing programmes designed to reduce the risk of sharks attacking humans at bathing beaches. However, more recent studies and application of modelling techniques allowing for density-dependent responses to the effects of stock reduction indicate that shark stocks can be harvested sustainably and, if carefully managed, can provide very stable fisheries. It is now understood that some species (such as Galeorhinus galeus , Carcharhinus plumbeus , Carcharodon carcharias and several species of dogfish) have low productivity, whereas other species (such as Mustelus antarcticus , Rhizoprionodon terraenovae , Sphyrna tiburo and Prionace glauca ) have higher productivity. This paper reviews the use of shark products, the effects of fishing on shark populations of the world, and recent developments in assessment of shark fishery stocks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Complexities of coastal shark movements and their implications for management
Speed, C., Field, I., Meekan, M., & Bradshaw, C. (2010) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08581 · Cited by 327
Simpfendorfer, C. A., Heupel, M. R., White, W. T., & Dulvy, N. K. (2011) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf11086 · Cited by 295
Evidence of Philopatry in Sharks and Implications for the Management of Shark Fisheries
Hueter, R. E., Heupel, M. R., Heist, E. J., & Keeney, D. B. (2004) · Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science · doi:10.2960/j.v35.m493 · Cited by 290
Effects of fishing on tropical reef associated shark populations on the Great Barrier Reef
Heupel, M. R., Williams, A. J., Welch, D. J., Ballagh, A., Mapstone, B. D., Carlos, G., Davies, C., & Simpfendorfer, C. A. (2009) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2008.10.005 · Cited by 86
Calibration of pelagic stereo‐ BRUV s and scientific longline surveys for sampling sharks
Santana‐Garcon, J., Braccini, M., Langlois, T. J., Newman, S. J., McAuley, R. B., & Harvey, E. S. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12216 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, T. I.
- Venue
- Marine and Freshwater Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1999-01-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 553-572
- ISSN
- 1323-1650 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-6059
- OpenAlex
- W1969769143
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can shark resources be harvested sustainably? A question revisited with a review of shark fisheries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/mf98017
- The paper
- Walker, T. I. (1999). Can shark resources be harvested sustainably? A question revisited with a review of shark fisheries. Marine and Freshwater Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf98017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.