The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors Influencing the Rate and Duration of Grain Filling in Wheat
Abstract
Controlled-environment conditions were used to examine the effects of cultivar and of temperature and illuminance after anthesis on grain setting and on the duration and rate of grain growth. After an initial lag period, which did not differ greatly between cultivars, grain dry weight increased linearly under most conditions until final grain weight was approached. Growth rate per grain depended on floret position within the ear, varied between cultivars (those with larger grains at maturity having a faster rate), and increased with rise in temperature. With cultivars in which grain number per ear was markedly affected by illuminance, light had relatively little effect on growth rate per grain. With those in which grain number was less affected by illuminance, growth rate per grain was highly responsive to it, especially in the more distal florets. In both cases there was a close relation between leaf photosynthetic rate as influenced by illuminance, the rate of grain growth per ear, and final grain yield per ear. The duration of linear grain growth, on the other hand, was scarcely influenced by illuminance, but was greatly reduced as temperature rose, with pronounced effects on grain yield per ear. Cultivars differed to some extent in their duration of linear growth, but these differences accounted for less of the difference in final weight per grain than did those in rate of grain growth. Under most conditions the cessation of grain growth did not appear to be due to lack of assimilates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop Production
Hatfield, J. L., Boote, K. J., Kimball, B. A., Ziska, L. H., Izaurralde, R. C., Ort, D., Thomson, A. M., & Wolfe, D. (2011) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0303 · Cited by 1,645
Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants
WARDLAW, I. F. (1990) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00524.x · Cited by 868
Self-citationExtreme heat effects on wheat senescence in India
Lobell, D. B., Sibley, A., & Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio, J. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1356 · Cited by 802
Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: A review
Barlow, K. M., Christy, B. P., O’Leary, G. J., Riffkin, P. A., & Nuttall, J. G. (2015) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.010 · Cited by 546
Heslot, N., Akdemir, D., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J.-L. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2231-5 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Sofield, I., Evans, L., Cook, M., & Wardlaw, I.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1977-10-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 785-797
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2328031695
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Influencing the Rate and Duration of Grain Filling in Wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9770785
- The paper
- Sofield, I., Evans, L., Cook, M., & Wardlaw, I. (1977). Factors Influencing the Rate and Duration of Grain Filling in Wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9770785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.