The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Soil Strength on the Growth of Young Wheat Plants
Abstract
Wheat seedlings were grown in soil of various strengths, obtained by changing the bulk density or the water content of the soil. Leaf expansion and transpiration rate were monitored from emergence until the main stem had 5-7 leaves. Leaf area, and shoot and root dry weights, were negatively correlated with soil strength as measured by penetrometer resistance. The growth of roots was less affected than that of shoots. Leaf expansion was reduced before the first leaf was fully expanded. Relative rates of leaf expansion thereafter were consistently lower at high soil strength, although not always significantly. High soil strength also produced substantially smaller stomatal conductances. All effects were the same whether variations of soil strength were brought about by changes in water content or in bulk density. Three possible causes of reduced shoot growth were examined: (1) a limiting supply of nutrients; or (2) of water, because of a restricted root system; or (3) a reduced carbon supply because of a higher carbon demand from the roots, or because of the low stomatal conductance. We conclude that these are all unlikely explanations for the onset of the effects of soil strength, which were independent of soil phosphorus content, of leaf water potential, and of the amount of carbon reserves in the seed. We suggest that growth of the shoot is primarily reduced in response to some hormonal message induced in the roots when they experience high soil strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review
Nawaz, M. F., Bourrié, G., & Trolard, F. (2013) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0071-8 · Cited by 787
Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice
Gowda, V. R. P., Henry, A., Yamauchi, A., Shashidhar, H. E., & Serraj, R. (2011) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.001 · Cited by 465
A Positive Root-sourced Signal as an Indicator of Soil Drying in Apple,Malus x domestica Borkh.
GOWING, D. J. G., DAVIES, W. J., & JONES, H. G. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/41.12.1535 · Cited by 363
Soil structure and plant growth: Impact of bulk density and biopores
Stirzaker, R. J., Passioura, J. B., & Wilms, Y. (1996) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf02257571 · Cited by 309
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Masle, J., & Passioura, J.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1987-12-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-656
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2326337020
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Soil Strength on the Growth of Young Wheat Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9870643
- The paper
- Masle, J., & Passioura, J. (1987). The Effect of Soil Strength on the Growth of Young Wheat Plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9870643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.