Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxygen isotope ratio of leaf and grain material correlates with stomatal conductance and grain yield in irrigated wheat

Barbour, Margaret M., Fischer, R. Anthony, Sayre, Ken D., Farquhar, Graham D.·2000·Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Abstract

Theory (Craig and Gordon 1965; Dongmann et al . 1974; Sternberg et al. 1986; Farquhar and Lloyd 1993) suggests that the oxygen isotope ratio (d 18 O) of plant material should reflect the evaporative conditions under which the material was formed, so that differences in stomatal conductance should show up in plant d 18 O. To test this theory we measured the oxygen isotope ratio of organic matter from flag leaves at anthesis and grain at harvest from eight cultivars of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) grown under irrigation in each of three seasons in Mexico. The cultivars ranged widely in stomatal conductance and in average grain yield, with which conductance was positively correlated. Supporting theory, the oxygen isotope ratio of flag leaves (d 18 O l ) was found to correlate negatively with stomatal conductance for two of the three seasons. The significant correlations are consistent with high conductance cultivars having lower leaf temperatures and kinetic fractionation factors, and higher vapour pressure fractionation factors and Péclet numbers, all of which combine to result in less enriched d 18 O l . Yield (grain weight per square meter) was also found to be significantly negatively correlated with d 18O l in two of the three seasons. d 18 O l was as good a predictor of yield as stomatal conductance, and significantly better than carbon isotope discrimination. Correlations between grain d 18 O (d 18 Og) and physiological parameters were less clear. Significant negative correlations between d 18 Og and stomatal conductance, leaf temperature and yield were found only during the first season. By measuring the oxygen isotope ratio of cellulose extracted from leaf samples, the difference in fractionation factors (ecp) for cellulose and whole leaf tissue was assessed. ecp was found to be variable, and more negative when d 18 O c and d 18 O l were lower. Cultivar means for d 13 C and d 18 O of whole leaf material were found to be significantly positively related, and the factors required to produce such a relationship are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/pp99041

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Barbour, M. M., Fischer, R. A., Sayre, K. D., & Farquhar, G. D.
Venue
Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
Published
2000-07-14
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
625-637
ISSN
  • 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-5655
OpenAlex
W1897697801
Cited by
237
References
2
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.