The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wheat Cultivars Vary Widely in Their Responses of Grain Yield and Quality to Short Periods of Post-Anthesis Heat Stress
Abstract
Short periods of high temperature (> 35ºC) are common during the post-anthesis period in Australian wheat crops and have recently been shown to significantly reduce grain yield and quality. In view of this, 75 cultivars of wheat were screened for tolerance to 3 days of high temperature (max. 40ºC). Detailed results for grain yield and quality are presented for five wheat cultivars in order to illustrate the wide range of responses to short periods of high temperature. Individual kernel mass decreased by up to 23%, depending on variety, and the gliadin : glutenin ratio altered in the range -9 to +18% in response to high temperature treatment, also depending on variety. Noodle swelling power was significantly affected by heat in two cultivars, but there was no significant change due to heat in the apparent amylose content in any variety. The marked response of several yield and quality components to a heat treatment lasting only ca 5% of the grain-filling period suggests that starch and protein synthesis do not immediately andlor fully recover from short, severe heat stress. In addition, we conclude that wheat shows considerable genetic variability in tolerance to short periods of high temperature for both grain yield and quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures
Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 · Cited by 2,359
Extreme heat effects on wheat senescence in India
Lobell, D. B., Sibley, A., & Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio, J. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1356 · Cited by 802
Achieving yield gains in wheat
REYNOLDS, M., FOULKES, J., FURBANK, R., GRIFFITHS, S., KING, J., MURCHIE, E., PARRY, M., & SLAFER, G. (2012) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02588.x · Cited by 607
Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: A review
Barlow, K. M., Christy, B. P., O’Leary, G. J., Riffkin, P. A., & Nuttall, J. G. (2015) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.010 · Cited by 546
FERRIS, R. (1998) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0740 · Cited by 417
Heat stress in cereals: Mechanisms and modelling
Eyshi Rezaei, E., Webber, H., Gaiser, T., Naab, J., & Ewert, F. (2015) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2014.10.003 · Cited by 313
Effects of drought and high temperature stress on synthetic hexaploid wheat
Pradhan, G. P., Prasad, P. V. V., Fritz, A. K., Kirkham, M. B., & Gill, B. S. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp11245 · Cited by 299
Models of grain quality in wheat—A review
Nuttall, J. G., O'Leary, G. J., Panozzo, J. F., Walker, C. K., Barlow, K. M., & Fitzgerald, G. J. (2017) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.12.011 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, P., & Nicolas, M.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 887-900
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2332435319
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.