The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sixty-Three Years Since Kautsky: Chlorophyll a Fluorescence
Abstract
In 1931, using their eyes as instruments, H . Kautsky and A . Hirsch related the time course of chlorophyll a fluorescence with photosynthesis in a less-than-one-page article in Naturwissenschaften (see Kautsky's photograph). Chlorophyll a fluorescence is now being used by hundreds of investigators as a probe for various aspects of photosynthesis-from excitation energy transfer in picosecond time scale to CO2 fixation in minutes . It is not only a much used, but also a much abused, tool. It is used because of it being a non-invasive, rapid and a highly sensitive probe, and misused because it is sometimes not recognised that it is affected by various photosynthetic and other reactions. I submit that, like any other technique, if it is used with care and with due regard for its time dependence and competing parameters. it will remain as the one-most powerful tool for probing excitation energy transfer, primary photochemistry, electron flow on both the donor and the acceptor side of photosystem II (PSII) of oxygenic PSII. Further, it is very useful in the quick assay of PSII mutations, and down- regulation and other adjustments to stress (excess light, heat, heavy metal, nutrients and certain herbicides). In this paper, I will present my viewpoint, not a review, on the conceptual and experimental developments in this field. Whenever appropriate, and without any shame and humility, I will include some of my involvement in the excitement surrounding this field. I hope that this paper will serve as a starting point for further discussion of not only the history, but the practical use of chlorophyll a fluorescence as an intrinsic probe of stresses to plants, as well as individual reactions of oxygenic photosynthesis, when combined with other parallel measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress
Mohammed, G. H., Colombo, R., Middleton, E. M., Rascher, U., van der Tol, C., Nedbal, L., Goulas, Y., Pérez-Priego, O., Damm, A., Meroni, M., et al. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.030 · Cited by 747
Roháček, K. (2002) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1023/a:1020125719386 · Cited by 724
Camejo, D., Rodríguez, P., Angeles Morales, M., Miguel Dell’Amico, J., Torrecillas, A., & Alarcón, J. J. (2005) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2004.07.014 · Cited by 636
A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ
Beutler, M., Wiltshire, K. H., Meyer, B., Moldaenke, C., Lüring, C., Meyerhöfer, M., Hansen, U.-P., & Dau, H. (2002) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016026607048 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Govindje, E.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1995-04-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-160
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2326247955
- Cited by
- 992
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sixty-Three Years Since Kautsky: Chlorophyll a Fluorescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9950131
- The paper
- Govindje, E. (1995). Sixty-Three Years Since Kautsky: Chlorophyll a Fluorescence. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9950131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.