Cited by 13Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsCommunity Health and DevelopmentIndigenous and Place-Based Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

He Korowai Manaaki: mapping assets to inform a strengths-based, Indigenous-led wrap-around maternity pathway

Abstract

A research partnership between Iwi (tribal group) Ngāti Pāhauwera and a university-based research centre specialising in Kaupapa Māori (by Māori, for Māori) research was formed in response to an invitation from Ngāti Pāhauwera. The initial partnership goal was to address health inequities experienced by Māori women and infants in Te Wairoa (the home place of the Iwi), a predominantly Māori, rural region in Aotearoa (New Zealand). The research developed by the partnership is an example of a culturally responsive research methodology. Key features include: being Iwi-initiated; community identification of strengths and assets; guidance by a community steering group; contribution to local Māori research capacity; and the development of a community-led augmented maternity care pathway that is now being delivered through primary care. These features have strengthened the engagement of the Iwi, researchers and community, and provided opportunities for transformative change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/py19029

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Guilliland K (1999) Midwifery in New Zealand: the New Zealand experience. In ‘Future Birth: The Place to be Born Conference. New South Wales, Australia’. (Birth International: Camperdown, NSW, Australia) Available at https://birthinternational.com/article/2016/02/ [Verified 1 October 2019]
  2. Mahuika, 2008, Kaupapa Maori theory is critical and anti-colonial., MAI Review, 3, 1
  3. Smith GH (1997) The Development of Kaupapa Maori Theory and Praxis. PhD thesis. University of Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adcock, A., Storey, F., Lawton, B., Bennett, M., Lambert, C., Edmonds, L., Stevenson, K., Geller, S., & Cram, F.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • EKatoa Ltd, PO Box 105611, Auckland City, Auckland 1143, New Zealand.
Corresponding author
Adcock, Anna
Venue
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Published
2019-10-21
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
509-514
ISSN
  • 1448-7527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1836-7399
OpenAlex
W2980565429
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Primary Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
Keywords
Kaupapa Māori research, Indigenous-led research, strengths-based approach, community asset mapping, health disparities, research collaboration, culturally responsive research, community participation, primary care, rural health
MeSH terms
Female, Health Services, Indigenous, Humans, Maternal Health Services, New Zealand, Pregnancy, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review