The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants
Abstract
Molecular data have had a profound impact on the field of plant systematics, and the application of DNA-sequence data to phylogenetic problems is now routine. The majority of data used in plant molecular phylogenetic studies derives from chloroplast DNA and nuclear rDNA, while the use of low-copy nuclear genes has not been widely adopted. This is due, at least in part, to the greater difficulty of isolating and characterising low-copy nuclear genes relative to chloroplast and rDNA sequences that are readily amplified with universal primers. The higher level of sequence variation characteristic of low-copy nuclear genes, however, often compensates for the experimental effort required to obtain them. In this review, we briefly discuss the strengths and limitations of chloroplast and rDNA sequences, and then focus our attention on the use of low-copy nuclear sequences. Advantages of low-copy nuclear sequences include a higher rate of evolution than for organellar sequences, the potential to accumulate datasets from multiple unlinked loci, and bi-parental inheritance. Challenges intrinsic to the use of low-copy nuclear sequences include distinguishing orthologous loci from divergent paralogous loci in the same gene family, being mindful of the complications arising from concerted evolution or recombination among paralogous sequences, and the presence of intraspecific, intrapopulational and intraindividual polymorphism. Finally, we provide a detailed protocol for the isolation, characterisation and use of low-copy nuclear sequences for phylogenetic studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
Hybrid origins of plant species
Rieseberg, L. H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359 · Cited by 1,246
Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution.
Birky, C. W. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331 · Cited by 969
The limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
Cited by
Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference
Álvarez, I., & Wendel, J. F. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00208-2 · Cited by 1,877
Self-citationChoosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode
Hollingsworth, P. M., Graham, S. W., & Little, D. P. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019254 · Cited by 1,305
Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Adaptation to Serpentine Soils
Brady, K. U., Kruckeberg, A. R., & Bradshaw Jr., H. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105730 · Cited by 733
Huang, H., Shi, C., Liu, Y., Mao, S.-Y., & Gao, L.-Z. (2014) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-151 · Cited by 433
A Statistical Approach for Distinguishing Hybridization and Incomplete Lineage Sorting
Joly, S., McLenachan, P. A., & Lockhart, P. J. (2009) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/600082 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Small, R. L., Cronn, R. C., & Wendel, J. F.
- Venue
- Australian Systematic Botany
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2004-04-29
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-170
- ISSN
- 1030-1887 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5701
- OpenAlex
- W1929440565
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sb03015
- The paper
- Small, R. L., Cronn, R. C., & Wendel, J. F. (2004). Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Australian Systematic Botany. https://doi.org/10.1071/sb03015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.