The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thirteen Camelliachloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: genome structure and phylogenetic relationships
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Camellia is an economically and phylogenetically important genus in the family Theaceae. Owing to numerous hybridization and polyploidization, it is taxonomically and phylogenetically ranked as one of the most challengingly difficult taxa in plants. Sequence comparisons of chloroplast (cp) genomes are of great interest to provide a robust evidence for taxonomic studies, species identification and understanding mechanisms that underlie the evolution of the Camellia species. RESULTS: The eight complete cp genomes and five draft cp genome sequences of Camellia species were determined using Illumina sequencing technology via a combined strategy of de novo and reference-guided assembly. The Camellia cp genomes exhibited typical circular structure that was rather conserved in genomic structure and the synteny of gene order. Differences of repeat sequences, simple sequence repeats, indels and substitutions were further examined among five complete cp genomes, representing a wide phylogenetic diversity in the genus. A total of fifteen molecular markers were identified with more than 1.5% sequence divergence that may be useful for further phylogenetic analysis and species identification of Camellia. Our results showed that, rather than functional constrains, it is the regional constraints that strongly affect sequence evolution of the cp genomes. In a substantial improvement over prior studies, evolutionary relationships of the section Thea were determined on basis of phylogenomic analyses of cp genome sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high degree of conservation between the Camellia cp genomes, sequence variation among species could still be detected, representing a wide phylogenetic diversity in the genus. Furthermore, phylogenomic analysis was conducted using 18 complete cp genomes and 5 draft cp genome sequences of Camellia species. Our results support Chang's taxonomical treatment that C. pubicosta may be classified into sect. Thea, and indicate that taxonomical value of the number of ovaries should be reconsidered when classifying the Camellia species. The availability of these cp genomes provides valuable genetic information for accurately identifying species, clarifying taxonomy and reconstructing the phylogeny of the genus Camellia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment
Katoh, K. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki198 · Cited by 4,837
Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA
Wyman, S. K., Jansen, R. K., & Boore, J. L. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352 · Cited by 2,988
De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing
Li, R., Zhu, H., Ruan, J., Qian, W., Fang, X., Shi, Z., Li, Y., Li, S., Shan, G., Kristiansen, K., et al. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.097261.109 · Cited by 2,926 · cited 1×
“First, the filtered reads were assembled into contigs using SOAPdenovo [59].”
MethodREPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale
Kurtz, S. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.22.4633 · Cited by 2,618
Thiel, T., Michalek, W., Varshney, R., & Graner, A. (2003) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0 · Cited by 2,535
Lohse, M., Drechsel, O., & Bock, R. (2007) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-007-0161-y · Cited by 1,254
Jansen, R. K., Cai, Z., Raubeson, L. A., Daniell, H., dePamphilis, C. W., Leebens-Mack, J., Müller, K. F., Guisinger-Bellian, M., Haberle, R. C., Hansen, A. K., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709121104 · Cited by 1,218
Genetic Structure and Diversity in Oryza sativa L.
Garris, A. J., Tai, T. H., Coburn, J., Kresovich, S., & McCouch, S. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035642 · Cited by 1,137
VISTA : visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length
Mayor, C., Brudno, M., Schwartz, J. R., Poliakov, A., Rubin, E. M., Frazer, K. A., Pachter, L. S., & Dubchak, I. (2000) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.11.1046 · Cited by 1,014
Cited by
Population sequencing enhances understanding of tea plant evolution
Wang, X., Feng, H., Chang, Y., Ma, C., Wang, L., Hao, X., Li, A., Cheng, H., Wang, L., Cui, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18228-8 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, H., Shi, C., Liu, Y., Mao, S.-Y., & Gao, L.-Z.
- Venue
- BMC Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2014-07-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-151
- ISSN
- 1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988061496
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 19.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thirteen Camelliachloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: genome structure and phylogenetic relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2148-14-151
- The paper
- Huang, H., Shi, C., Liu, Y., Mao, S.-Y., & Gao, L.-Z. (2014). Thirteen Camelliachloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: genome structure and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.