Cited by 195LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

Sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships

Open access
Richters, Juliet, Altman, Dennis, Badcock, Paul B., Smith, Anthony M. A., de Visser, Richard O., Grulich, Andrew E., Rissel, Chris, Simpson, Judy M.·2014·Sexual Health

Abstract

Unlabelled Background Behavioural and other aspects of sexuality are not always consistent. This study describes the prevalence and overlap of same-sex and other-sex attraction and experience and of different sexual identities in Australia. Methods Computer-assisted telephone interviews were completed by a representative sample of 20094 men and women aged 16-69 years recruited by landline and mobile phone random-digit dialling with a response rate (participation rate among eligible people) of 66.2%. Respondents were asked about their sexual identity ('Do you think of yourself as' heterosexual/straight, homosexual/gay, bisexual, etc.) and the sex of people with whom they had ever had sexual contact and to whom they had felt sexually attracted. Results Men and women had different patterns of sexual identity. Although the majority of people identified as heterosexual (97% men, 96% women), women were more likely than men to identify as bisexual. Women were less likely than men to report exclusively other-sex or same-sex attraction and experience; 9% of men and 19% of women had some history of same-sex attraction and/or experience. Sexual attraction and experience did not necessarily correspond. Homosexual/gay identity was more common among men with tertiary education and living in cities and less common among men with blue-collar jobs. Many gay men (53%) and lesbians (76%) had some experience with an other-sex partner. More women identified as lesbian or bisexual than in 2001-02.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sh14117

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 195

Authors
Richters, J., Altman, D., Badcock, P. B., Smith, A. M. A., de Visser, R. O., Grulich, A. E., Rissel, C., & Simpson, J. M.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • ESchool of Psychology, Pevensey 1, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Richters, Juliet
Venue
Sexual Health
Published
2014-11-07
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
451-460
ISSN
  • 1448-5028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-8987
OpenAlex
W2153785747
Cited by
195
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexual Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
sexual identity, sexual attraction, sexual experience, same-sex attraction, bisexual identity, gay men, lesbians, heterosexual identity, gender differences, non-heterosexual identity, sexual stigma, Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review