Land-use and historical management effects on soil organic carbon in grazing systems on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales
Abstract
We examined soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration (mg g–1) and total organic carbon (TOC) stock (Mg ha–1 to 30 cm soil depth) in three pasture systems in northern New South Wales: improved pasture, native pasture, and lightly wooded pasture, at two sampling times (2009 and 2011). No significant difference was found in SOC or TOC between sample times, suggesting that under the conditions we examined, neither 2 years nor an intervening significant rainfall event was sufficient to change the quantity or our capacity to detect SOC, and neither represented a barrier to soil carbon accounting. Low fertility, lightly wooded pastures had a slightly but significantly lower SOC concentration, particularly in the surface soil layers. However, no significant differences in TOC were detected between the three pasture systems studied, and from a carbon estimation perspective, they represent one, single dataset. A wide range in TOC values existed within the dataset that could not be explained by environmental factors. The TOC was weakly but significantly correlated with soil nitrogen and phosphorus, but a more significant pattern seemed to be the association of high TOC with proportionally larger subsoil (0.1–0.3 m) organic carbon storage. This we attribute to historical, long-term rather than contemporary management. Of the SOC fractions, particulate organic carbon (POC) dominated in the surface layers but diminished with depth, whereas the proportion of humic carbon (HUM) and resistant…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The variance around that mean value was large and in many individual studies the data were insignificantly different between management categories.
“However, the variance around that mean value was large and in many individual studies the data were insignificantly different between management categories [27], [28], [29].”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Wilson and Lonergan [29] found no difference in SOC stocks in the 0-30 cm layer between similar styles of rotational and continuous grazing of improved pastures in the central Tablelands, NSW.
“Wilson and Lonergan [29] found no difference in SOC stocks in the 0–30 cm layer between similar styles of rotational and continuous grazing of improved pastures in the central Tablelands, NSW.”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
The inherent variability in SOC within paddocks and across small regions makes detecting small but real improvements in SOC difficult.
“As seen in this study and others [28], [29], the inherent variability in SOC within paddocks and across small regions makes detecting small but real improvements in SOC difficult.”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT AND CONVERSION INTO GRASSLAND: EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON
Conant, R. T., Paustian, K., & Elliott, E. T. (2001) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0343:gmacig]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments
Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A., & Joseph, S. (2008) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr08036 · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia
Sanderman, J., Reseigh, J., Wurst, M., Young, M.-A., & Austin, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136157 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wilson, B. R., & Lonergan, V. E.
- Affiliations
- Guizhou University (CN)
- University of New England (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Brian R.
- ORCID
- Wilson, Brian R.
- Venue
- Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2013-12-20
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 668-679
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1838-675X
- 1838-6768
- OpenAlex
- W2123314123
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Research (publishedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NSW Office of Environment and Heritage
- University of New England
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Keywords
- soil organic carbon, grazing systems, pasture systems, improved pastures, natural pastures, particulate organic carbon, humic carbon, soil depth, soil nitrogen and phosphorus, subsoil organic carbon, soil carbon accounting, Northern Tablelands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review