The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The removal of magnetic materials from surface soils - a solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR study
Abstract
Five surface soils of differing chemical and mineralogical compositions were subjected to either a sequence of dithionite/citrate extractions in which the soil: citrate ratio was varied or to a sequence of 1% or 2% HF extractions. The 2% HF treatment resulted in the removal of the highest Fe concentrations (79-95%) while the dithionite/citrate extractions were less effective in removing Fe from the same soils (18-75%). The Fe remaining after HF treatment appeared to be mostly associated with ilmenite crystals which were only slowly attacked by the dilute acid. During the 2% HF treatments, some organic carbon was lost (8-17%), but this loss had no significant effect on the organic chemistry of the samples as determined by CP/MAS 13C n.m.r. spectroscopy. The total 13C signal recovered after the various treatments was found to be correlated, in order of decreasing significance, with the mineral fraction present in the sample, the organic carbon/Fe ratio and the mass magnetic susceptibility. The expression (organic carbon/Fe) -0.147 (mineral fraction present in the sample) +0.043 (1/mass magnetic susceptibility), accounted for 85.3% of the variation in the relative visibility of the 13C signal. Prior to soil state CP/MAS 13C n.m.r. analysis, the recommended pretreatment for surface soils containing Fe involves a sequence of 2% HF extractions in the order 5 x 1 h, 2 x 16 h and 1 x 64 h. For soils high in Fe, this procedure allows CP/MAS 13C n.m.r. spectra to be acquired that would otherwise be difficult to obtain. It also results in a significant increase in sensitivity and in resolution of the 13C n.m.r. spectra of soils with moderate Fe contents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle
Rumpel, C., & Kögel-Knabner, I. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5 · Cited by 1,848
SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,590
Cycling and composition of organic matter in terrestrial and marine ecosystems
Baldock, J. A., Masiello, C. A., Gélinas, Y., & Hedges, J. I. (2004) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2004.06.016 · Cited by 414
KNICKER, H., GONZALEZVILA, F., POLVILLO, O., GONZALEZ, J., & ALMENDROS, G. (2005) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.008 · Cited by 295
Li, Y., Nie, C., Liu, Y., Du, W., & He, P. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.031 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Skjemstad, J., Clarke, P., Taylor, J., Oades, J., & Newman, R.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1215-1229
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-568X
- OpenAlex
- W2060492353
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The removal of magnetic materials from surface soils - a solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr9941215
- The paper
- Skjemstad, J., Clarke, P., Taylor, J., Oades, J., & Newman, R. (1994). The removal of magnetic materials from surface soils - a solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR study. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr9941215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.