The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization and analysis of soils using mid-infrared partial least-squares .2. Correlations with some laboratory data
Abstract
Infrared partial least squares (PLS) analysis is shown to provide a simple, rapid chemometric technique for the simultaneous analysis of soil properties. The method is capable of extracting both qualitative and quantitative information from soil spectra. A number of the mineral and organic components which are responsible for certain soil properties have been identified and the prediction of these properties assessed. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform (DRIFT) spectra of whole soils were recorded to form a large training data set. The spectral information from this set was compressed into a small number of subspectra (called weight loadings) which contained positive and negative peaks reflecting correlations between the soil mineral and organic components and corresponding analytical data. Positive peaks in the weight loadings corresponding to organic components including alkyl, carboxylic and amide species were highly correlated with OC and N. Likewise, smectite, kaolinite and gibbsite clay minerals, together with organic alkyl and carboxylic species, contributed either positively or negatively to pH, sum of cations and clay content. Positive peaks due to calcite were well resolved in the first carbonate weight loading. Quartz was identified as an 'interference' for all analyses, with a series of negative peaks in the weight loadings. Implications were that quartz exerted a strong spectral signal for the majority of soil spectra, although it was not directly related to particular analyses. The usual PLS method, in which there is assumed to be a linear relationship between the loading intensities and soil property values, was found to give nonlinear prediction regression. The nonlinearity was assumed to be due to the effects of nonlinear response of the DRIFT signal and to significant compositional variability between calibration samples with high and low analyte concentrations. An alternative strategy of using a locally linear PLS model was tested, where small subsets of the total span of analytical values were independently used for PLS analysis. This approach improved prediction linearity and precision improved significantly for most analyses. The PLS method was thus shown to provide a useful surrogate technique for the study of soils, with which the PLS analysis of a single spectrum could provide simultaneous qualitative and quantitative information on a number of widely different soil analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mid-Infrared and Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Soil Carbon Measurement
McCarty, G. W., Reeves, J. B., Reeves, V. B., Follett, R. F., & Kimble, J. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.0640 · Cited by 462
Wilson, B. R., & Lonergan, V. E. (2013) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr12376 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Janik, L., & Skjemstad, J.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 637-650
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-568X
- OpenAlex
- W2083152587
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization and analysis of soils using mid-infrared partial least-squares .2. Correlations with some laboratory data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr9950637
- The paper
- Janik, L., & Skjemstad, J. (1995). Characterization and analysis of soils using mid-infrared partial least-squares .2. Correlations with some laboratory data. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr9950637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.