Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Wildland firefighter load carriage: effects on transit time and physiological responses during simulated escape to safety zone

Ruby, B. C., III, G. W. Leadbetter, Armstrong, D. W., Gaskill, S. E.·2003·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of load carriage on transit time during simulated escape route evacuation. Subjects (8 males, 5 females) completed two maximal field hikes in random order on two successive days (16 kg [35 lb] line gear pack trial and no pack trial). Subjects carried a fire shelter and a Pulaski (the most commonly used fireline construction tool in the United States, consisting of a hoe/ax combination with an 80 cm handle) during each trial. Trials were completed on a dirt trail 660.5 m in length with a vertical rise of 137 m (average grade = 20.75%). Expired air samples were analysed continuously during each trial (Cosmed K4 or Aerosport VO2000). Blood samples were collected before and 2 min after exercise for lactate analysis. Transit time was significantly faster during the No pack trial, representing a 21.5 and 26.3% faster transit time for males and females, respectively. For the males, mean VO2 was higher during the No pack trial. The difference in blood lactate (peak–rest) was significantly higher during the Pack trial for the male subjects. High correlations between peak VO2 (L min–1) and transit rates were noted ( r = 0.82 for the Pack trial and 0.87 for the No pack trial), indicating the contribution of aerobic fitness to transit time. These data suggest that escape routes should include a physical strain index related to load carriage, distance and slope and that line gear weight standards should be further evaluated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf02025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ruby, B. C., III, G. W. L., Armstrong, D. W., & Gaskill, S. E.
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2003-03-13
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
111-116
ISSN
  • 1049-8001
  • 1448-5516
Cited by
30
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review