The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wildland firefighter load carriage: effects on transit time and physiological responses during simulated escape to safety zone
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of load carriage on transit time during simulated escape route evacuation. Subjects (8 males, 5 females) completed two maximal field hikes in random order on two successive days (16 kg [35 lb] line gear pack trial and no pack trial). Subjects carried a fire shelter and a Pulaski (the most commonly used fireline construction tool in the United States, consisting of a hoe/ax combination with an 80 cm handle) during each trial. Trials were completed on a dirt trail 660.5 m in length with a vertical rise of 137 m (average grade = 20.75%). Expired air samples were analysed continuously during each trial (Cosmed K4 or Aerosport VO2000). Blood samples were collected before and 2 min after exercise for lactate analysis. Transit time was significantly faster during the No pack trial, representing a 21.5 and 26.3% faster transit time for males and females, respectively. For the males, mean VO2 was higher during the No pack trial. The difference in blood lactate (peak–rest) was significantly higher during the Pack trial for the male subjects. High correlations between peak VO2 (L min–1) and transit rates were noted ( r = 0.82 for the Pack trial and 0.87 for the No pack trial), indicating the contribution of aerobic fitness to transit time. These data suggest that escape routes should include a physical strain index related to load carriage, distance and slope and that line gear weight standards should be further evaluated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carrying a load has a significant effect on travel rate.
“studies have found that carrying a load has a significant effect on travel rate [22,23,36,37].”
From Modeling wildland firefighter travel rates by terrain slope: results from GPS-tracking of type 1 crew movement (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Ruby et al. [22] and Alexander et al. [23] found load to have a negative effect on travel rates; however, neither produced predictive models.
“Both studies found load to have a negative effect on travel rates; however, neither produced predictive models.”
From Modeling wildland firefighter travel rates by terrain slope: results from GPS-tracking of type 1 crew movement (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., & Butler, B. W. (2017) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf17031 · Cited by 42
Sullivan, P. R., Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., Brewer, S. C., & Butler, B. W. (2020) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire3030052 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruby, B. C., III, G. W. L., Armstrong, D. W., & Gaskill, S. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2003-03-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-116
- ISSN
- 1049-8001
- 1448-5516
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review