Cited by 42Remote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsOccupational Health and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A LiDAR-based analysis of the effects of slope, vegetation density, and ground surface roughness on travel rates for wildland firefighter escape route mapping

Campbell, Michael J., Dennison, Philip E., Butler, Bret W.·2017·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

Escape routes are essential components of wildland firefighter safety, providing pre-defined pathways to a safety zone. Among the many factors that affect travel rates along an escape route, landscape conditions such as slope, low-lying vegetation density, and ground surface roughness are particularly influential, and can be measured using airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. In order to develop a robust, quantitative understanding of the effects of these landscape conditions on travel rates, we performed an experiment wherein study participants were timed while walking along a series of transects within a study area dominated by grasses, sagebrush and juniper. We compared resultant travel rates to LiDAR-derived estimates of slope, vegetation density and ground surface roughness using linear mixed effects modelling to quantify the relationships between these landscape conditions and travel rates. The best-fit model revealed significant negative relationships between travel rates and each of the three landscape conditions, suggesting that, in order of decreasing magnitude, as density, slope and roughness increase, travel rates decrease. Model coefficients were used to map travel impedance within the study area using LiDAR data, which enabled mapping the most efficient routes from fire crew locations to safety zones and provided an estimate of travel time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf17031

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence, abundance, structure, and distribution of vegetation have major limiting effects on the ease with which one can move through a landscape.

    “The presence, abundance, structure, and distribution of vegetation also have major limiting effects on the ease with which one can move through a landscape20–22.”
  • Shorter vegetation at or near the ground surface can affect foot placement and alter gait.

    “Shorter vegetation at or near the ground surface (i.e., grasses, forbs, shrubs) can affect foot placement and alter gait.”
  • Taller shrubs and trees can impact movement in ways ranging from avoidance to impedance.

    “Taller shrubs and trees can impact movement in a variety of ways, ranging from avoidance (i.e., moving around obstacles deemed impassible) to impedance (i.e., moving through passible vegetation but being physically restrained by it).”
  • Campbell, Dennison, and Butler conducted a study using lidar data to explore the effects of ground roughness and vegetation density on firefighter evacuation speeds, but did not consider hill slope separately.

    “Campbell, Dennison, and Butler [15] conducted a study using lidar data to explore the effects of ground roughness and vegetation density on firefighter evacuation speeds, but they did not consider the hill slope separately.”
  • Improving our understanding of how firefighters traverse various landscapes is essential for the assessment of relative egress capacity, estimation of medical evacuation time, mapping of least-cost escape routes, and knowledge of when to trigger an evacuation.

    “Improving our understanding of how firefighters traverse various landscapes is essential for the assessment of relative egress capacity [24], estimation of medical evacuation time [44], mapping of least-cost escape routes [34], and knowledge of when to trigger an evacuation [26].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beighley, 1995, Beyond the safety zone: creating a margin of safety., Fire Management Notes, 55, 22
  2. Gleason, 1991, LCES – a key to safety in the wildland fire environment., Fire Management Notes, 52, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., & Butler, B. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • ADepartment of Geography, University of Utah, 332 S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
  • BRocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 5775 US Highway 10 W, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.
Corresponding author
Campbell, Michael J.
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2017-09-27
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
884-895
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W2757151358
Cited by
42
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
travel rate, slope, vegetation density, ground roughness, LiDAR, firefighter safety, travel time estimation, sagebrush, juniper, grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review