Post-fire water-quality response in the western United States
Abstract
Wildfires are increasing in size and severity in forested landscapes across the Western United States. Not only do fires alter land surfaces, but they also affect the surface water quality in downstream systems. Previous studies of individual fires have observed an increase in various forms of nutrients, ions, sediments and metals in stream water for different post-fire time periods. In this research, data were compiled for over 24 000 fires across the western United States to evaluate post-fire water-quality response. The database included millions of water-quality data points downstream of these fires, and was synthesised along with geophysical data from each burned watershed. Data from 159 fires in 153 burned watersheds were used to identify common water-quality response during the first 5 years after a fire. Within this large dataset, a subset of seven fires was examined further to identify trends in water-quality response. Change-point analysis was used to identify moments in the post-fire water-quality data where significant shifts in analyte concentrations occurred. Evaluating individual fires revealed strong initial increases or decreases in concentrations, depending on the analyte, that are masked when averaged over 5 years. Evidence from this analysis shows significant increases in nutrient flux (different forms of nitrogen and phosphorus), major-ion flux and metal concentrations are the most common changes in stream water quality within the first 5 years after fire. Dissolved constituents of ions and metals tended to decrease in concentration 5 years after fire whereas particulate matter concentration continued to increase. Assembling this unique and extensive dataset provided the opportunity to determine the most common post-fire water-quality changes in the large and diverse Western USA. Results from this study could inform studies in other parts of the world, will help parameterise and validate post-fire water-quality models, and assist communities affected by wildfire to anticipate changes to their water quality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cations like calcium, potassium, and magnesium generally follow nutrient trends, increasing after post-fire precipitation events as a function of burned area and burn severity.
“Cations like calcium, potassium, and magnesium generally follow nutrient trends, increasing after post-fire precipitation events as a function of burned area and burn severity (Bitner et al., 2001; Rust et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2011) as they are primarily generated from ash (Ranalli, 2004).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
Proposed mechanisms explaining increased responses of nutrients post-fire include volatilization and deposition, reduced plant and microbial uptake, and increased leaching and runoff into waterbodies.
“Proposed mechanisms explaining increased responses of nutrients post-fire include volatilization and deposition, reduced plant and microbial uptake, and increased leaching and runoff into waterbodies (Emelko et al., 2016; Rust et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2011).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
The reported durations of metal responses were generally less than 5 yr, a finding consistent with that of Rust et al. (2018).
“The reported durations of metal responses were generally less than 5 yr, a finding consistent with that of Rust et al. (2018), which surveyed post-fire water quality responses across multiple watersheds in the western U.S.”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
Wildfires can mobilize metals and other inorganic chemicals which are then transported by precipitation events into downstream waters.
“Wildfires can mobilize metals and other inorganic chemicals which are then transported by precipitation events into downstream waters (e.g., see Abraham et al., 2017b; Rust et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2011).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
Increases in metals were observed following fire across biomes, including boreal peatlands, temperate forests, and Mediterranean forests, and from wildfires as well as prescribed burns.
“Increases in metals were observed following fire across biomes, including boreal peatlands (Brown et al., 2013), temperate forests (Rust et al., 2018), and Mediterranean forests (Burton et al., 2016; Nunes et al., 2017), and from wildfires as well as prescribed burns (Harper et al., 2018).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
Elevated arsenic concentrations have been reported in multiple watersheds post-fire in the western U.S.
“Elevated arsenic concentrations have been reported in multiple watersheds post-fire in the western U.S. (Rust et al., 2018).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
Previous reviews have emphasized the problems to water quality posed by sediments, nutrients, and metals, among other chemicals.
“Previous reviews have emphasized the problems to water quality posed by sediments, nutrients, and metals, among other chemicals (e.g., Bladon et al., 2014; Rust et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2011).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
Nutrients and metals were commonly elevated post-fire.
“Similar to the other studies (e.g., Rust et al., 2018, 2019), we found that nutrients and metals were commonly elevated post-fire.”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2018
Cites
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176 · see citing works
Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply
Bladon, K. D., Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., & Stone, M. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es500130g · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Moody, J. A., & Martin, D. A. (2001) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.386 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · doi:10.1017/9781009325844 · Cited by 8,473 · see citing works
Wildfires Alter Forest Watersheds and Threaten Drinking Water Quality
Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., & Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00670 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., & Leibowitz, S. G. (2022) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr030699 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“Proposed mechanisms explaining increased responses of nutrients post-fire include volatilization and deposition, reduced plant and microbial uptake, and increased leaching and runoff into waterbodies (Emelko et al., 2016; Rust et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2011).”
InfluentialBarnes, P. W., Robson, T. M., Zepp, R. G., Bornman, J. F., Jansen, M. A. K., Ossola, R., Wang, Q.-W., Robinson, S. A., Foereid, B., Klekociuk, A. R., et al. (2023) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43630-023-00376-7 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rust, A. J., Hogue, T. S., Saxe, S., & McCray, J.
- Affiliations
- Colorado School of Mines (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rust, Ashley J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2018-03-28
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-216
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2794858977
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Joint Fire Science Program
- U.S. Geological Survey
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Keywords
- forest fires, stream water quality, nutrient fluxes, nitrogen, phosphorus, major ions, metal concentrations, particulate matter, change-point analysis, burned watersheds, American West
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review