The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Wildlife has existed in urban areas since records began. However, the discipline of urban ecology is relatively new and one that is undergoing rapid growth. All wildlife in urban areas will interact with humans to some degree. With rates of urbanisation increasing globally, there is a pressing need to understand the type and nature of human–wildlife interactions within urban environments, to help manage, mitigate or even promote these interactions. Much research attention has focussed on the core topic of human–wildlife conflict. This inherent bias in the literature is probably driven by the ease with which it can be quantified and assessed. Human–wildlife conflicts in terms of disease transmission, physical attack and property damage are important topics to understand. Equally, the benefits of human–wildlife interactions are becoming increasingly recognised, despite being harder to quantify and generalise. Wildlife may contribute to the provision of ecosystem services in urban areas, and some recent work has shown how interactions with wildlife can provide a range of benefits to health and wellbeing. More research is needed to improve understanding in this area, requiring wildlife biologists to work with other disciplines including economics, public health, sociology, ethics, psychology and planning. There will always be a need to control wildlife populations in certain urban situations to reduce human–wildlife conflict. However, in an increasingly urbanised and resource-constrained world, we need to learn how to manage the risks from wildlife in new ways, and to understand how to maximise the diverse benefits that living with wildlife can bring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Change and the Ecology of Cities
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150195 · Cited by 7,139
(2011) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.1002/(issn)1938-5463a · Cited by 5,545
Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife-- Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A., & Hyatt, A. D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5452.443 · Cited by 4,885
Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization
McKinney, M. L. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005 · Cited by 3,841
Weltgesundheitsorganisation (2005) · Cited by 3,799
No health without mental health
Prince, M., Patel, V., Saxena, S., Maj, M., Maselko, J., Phillips, M. R., & Rahman, A. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61238-0 · Cited by 3,753
Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation
McKINNEY, M. L. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:ubac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,663
Ecosystem services in urban areas
Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00013-0 · Cited by 2,942
Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001 · Cited by 2,810
Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals
McKinney, M. L. (2008) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4 · Cited by 2,556
Cited by
Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world
König, H. J., Kiffner, C., Kramer‐Schadt, S., Fürst, C., Keuling, O., & Ford, A. T. (2020) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13513 · Cited by 489
Ecological impacts of human‐induced animal behaviour change
Wilson, M. W., Ridlon, A. D., Gaynor, K. M., Gaines, S. D., Stier, A. C., & Halpern, B. S. (2020) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13571 · Cited by 281
Public perception of urban companion animals during the COVID-19 outbreak in China
Yin, D., Gao, Q., Zhu, H., & Li, J. (2020) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102399 · Cited by 23
Tolhurst, B. A., Baker, R. J., Cagnacci, F., & Scott, D. M. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10071167 · Cited by 16
Gariglio, A. C. R. S., Boere, V., Malukiewicz, J., Abreu Fonseca, L., Calais, A., & Silva, I. O. (2021) · Journal of Medical Primatology · doi:10.1111/jmp.12518 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Soulsbury, C. D., & White, P. C. L.
- Venue
- Wildlife Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 541-553
- ISSN
- 1035-3712 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5494
- OpenAlex
- W1866903916
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 152
- FWCI
- 15.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/wr14229
- The paper
- Soulsbury, C. D., & White, P. C. L. (2016). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr14229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.