The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells
Open accessAbstract
It has generally been considered that important biological effects of ionizing radiation arise as a direct consequence of DNA damage occurring in irradiated cells. We have examined this hypothesis by exposing cells to very low fluences of alpha-particles, similar to those emitted by radon gas, such that as few as 1% of the cells in a population are traversed by a particle and thus receive any radiation exposure. By using the endpoints of changes in gene expression and induction of DNA damage, we show that nonirradiated "bystander" cells participate in the overall response of confluent density-inhibited populations of cultured fibroblast and epithelial cells. By in situ immunofluorescence techniques and the use of cells genetically compromised in their ability to perform gap junction intercellular communication, we present direct evidence for the involvement of connexin43-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals to nonirradiated cells. Induction of the stress-inducible p21(Waf1) protein in aggregates of neighboring cells far exceeding the fraction of cells whose nucleus has been traversed occurred in gap junction-competent cells only. These changes in p21(Waf1) expression correlated with both the induction of DNA damage (as measured by micronucleus formation) as well as increased Ser-15 phosphorylation of p53.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Morgan, W. F. (2003) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0567:nadeoe]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 649
Biological response of cancer cells to radiation treatment
Baskar, R., Dai, J., Wenlong, N., Yeo, R., & Yeoh, K.-W. (2014) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2014.00024 · Cited by 638
Sgouros, G., Roeske, J. C., McDevitt, M. R., Palm, S., Allen, B. J., Fisher, D. R., Brill, A. B., Song, H., Howell, R. W., & Akabani, G. (2010) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.058651 · Cited by 552
Therapeutic Radionuclides: Biophysical and Radiobiologic Principles
Kassis, A. I. (2008) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.05.002 · Cited by 306
Mechanism of radiation-induced bystander effect: Role of the cyclooxygenase-2 signaling pathway
Zhou, H., Ivanov, V. N., Gillespie, J., Geard, C. R., Amundson, S. A., Brenner, D. J., Yu, Z., Lieberman, H. B., & Hei, T. K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0505473102 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Azzam, E. I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-01-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 473-478
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075497030
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.011417098
- The paper
- Azzam, E. I. (2001). Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.011417098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.