The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity
Open accessAbstract
Evolutionary processes generating biodiversity and ecological mechanisms maintaining biodiversity seem to be diverse themselves. Conventional explanations of biodiversity such as niche differentiation, density-dependent predation pressure, or habitat heterogeneity seem satisfactory to explain diversity in communities of macrobial organisms such as higher plants and animals. For a long time the often high diversity among microscopic organisms in seemingly uniform environments, the famous “paradox of the plankton,” has been difficult to understand. The biodiversity in bacterial communities has been shown to be sometimes orders of magnitudes higher than the diversity of known macrobial systems. Based on a spatially explicit game theoretical model with multiply cyclic dominance structures, we suggest that antibiotic interactions within microbial communities may be very effective in maintaining diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 · Cited by 5,502
Cited by
An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human–microbe mutualism and disease
Dethlefsen, L., McFall-Ngai, M., & Relman, D. A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06245 · Cited by 1,660
Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes
Fierer, N., Leff, J. W., Adams, B. J., Nielsen, U. N., Bates, S. T., Lauber, C. L., Owens, S., Gilbert, J. A., Wall, D. H., & Caporaso, J. G. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215210110 · Cited by 1,643
Paneth cells, antimicrobial peptides and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis
Bevins, C. L., & Salzman, N. H. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2546 · Cited by 1,238
Antibiotic-mediated antagonism leads to a bacterial game of rock–paper–scissors in vivo
Kirkup, B. C., & Riley, M. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02429 · Cited by 555
Assembly of the human intestinal microbiota
Dethlefsen, L., Eckburg, P. B., Bik, E. M., & Relman, D. A. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.013 · Cited by 509
Metadata
- Authors
- Czárán, T. L., Hoekstra, R. F., & Pagie, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-01-15
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 786-790
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2089474999
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.012399899
- The paper
- Czárán, T. L., Hoekstra, R. F., & Pagie, L. (2002). Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012399899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.