The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging
Open accessAbstract
According to classical concepts of physiologic control, healthy systems are self-regulated to reduce variability and maintain physiologic constancy. Contrary to the predictions of homeostasis, however, the output of a wide variety of systems, such as the normal human heartbeat, fluctuates in a complex manner, even under resting conditions. Scaling techniques adapted from statistical physics reveal the presence of long-range, power-law correlations, as part of multifractal cascades operating over a wide range of time scales. These scaling properties suggest that the nonlinear regulatory systems are operating far from equilibrium, and that maintaining constancy is not the goal of physiologic control. In contrast, for subjects at high risk of sudden death (including those with heart failure), fractal organization, along with certain nonlinear interactions, breaks down. Application of fractal analysis may provide new approaches to assessing cardiac risk and forecasting sudden cardiac death, as well as to monitoring the aging process. Similar approaches show promise in assessing other regulatory systems, such as human gait control in health and disease. Elucidating the fractal and nonlinear mechanisms involved in physiologic control and complex signaling networks is emerging as a major challenge in the postgenomic era.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., Mietus, J. E., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215 · Cited by 14,809
Self-citationThe Fourth Dimension of Life: Fractal Geometry and Allometric Scaling of Organisms
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., & Enquist, B. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5420.1677 · Cited by 1,718
Ho, K. K. L., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., Mietus, J. E., Larson, M. G., Levy, D., & Goldberger, A. L. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.3.842 · Cited by 489
Self-citation
Cited by
Multiscale Entropy Analysis of Complex Physiologic Time Series
Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L., & Peng, C.-K. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.068102 · Cited by 3,207
Self-citationEEG microstate sequences in healthy humans at rest reveal scale-free dynamics.
Van De Ville, D., Britz, J., & Michel, C. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1007841107 · Cited by 606
Network perspectives on the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation
McIntyre, C. C., & Hahn, P. J. (2010) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.09.022 · Cited by 439
Considerations in the assessment of heart rate variability in biobehavioral research
Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. A. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00805 · Cited by 395
Methods for objective measure, quantification and analysis of sedentary behaviour and inactivity
Chastin, S. F. M., & Granat, M. H. (2010) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.002 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-02-19
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- 2466-2472
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2102568183
- Cited by
- 2,205
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.