Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal linkage between the phenotypic and genomic responses to caloric restriction

Dhahbi, Joseph M., Kim, Hyon-Jeen, Mote, Patricia L., Beaver, Robert J., Spindler, Stephen R.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Caloric restriction (CR), the consumption of fewer calories while avoiding malnutrition, decelerates the rate of aging and the development of age-related diseases. CR has been viewed as less effective in older animals and as acting incrementally to slow or prevent age-related changes in gene expression. Here we demonstrate that CR initiated in 19-month-old mice begins within 2 months to increase the mean time to death by 42% and increase mean and maximum lifespans by 4.7 ( P = 0.000017) and 6.0 months ( P = 0.000056), respectively. The rate of age-associated mortality was decreased 3.1-fold. Between the first and second breakpoints in the CR survival curve (between 21 and 31 months of age), tumors as a cause of death decreased from 80% to 67% ( P = 0.012). Genome-wide microarray analysis of hepatic RNA from old control mice switched to CR for 2, 4, and 8 weeks showed a rapid and progressive shift toward the gene expression profile produced by long-term CR. This shift took place in the time frame required to induce the health and longevity effects of CR. Shifting from long-term CR to a control diet, which returns animals to the control rate of aging, reversed 90% of the gene expression effects of long-term CR within 8 weeks. These results suggest a cause-and-effect relationship between the rate of aging and the CR-associated gene expression biomarkers. Therefore, therapeutics mimicking the gene-expression biomarkers of CR may reproduce its physiological effects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0305300101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Spindler S. R. (2003) in Anti-Aging Therapy for Plastic Surgery eds. Kinney B. & Carraway J. (Quality Medical St. Louis) in press.
  2. 10.1093/jn/116.4.641 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/35041700 · DOI
  4. Brown-Borg, H. M., Borg, K. E., Meliska, C. J. & Bartke, A. (1996) Nature 384, 33 (lett.).
  5. Van Remmen H. Ward W. F. Sabia R. V. & Richardson A. (1995) in Handbook of Physiology ed. Masoro E. J. (Oxford Univ. Press New York) pp. 171–234. · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.191313598 · DOI
  7. Subcommittee on Laboratory Animal Nutrition and Committee on Animal Nutrition (1978) in Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals: Rat Mouse Gerbil Guinea Pig Hamster Vole Fish (Natl. Acad. Press Washington DC) pp. 38–50.
  8. 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60646-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/jn/126.2.416 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0531-5565(80)90029-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1057987 · DOI
  12. 10.1210/endo.141.7.7586 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00038-9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1126/science.1086016 · DOI
  15. Lipman, R. D., Smith, D. E., Blumberg, J. B. & Bronson, R. T. (1998) Aging 10, 463–470.10078316
  16. 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3500 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00230-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/jn/132.1.31 · DOI
  19. Dhahbi, J. M., Mote, P. L., Wingo, J., Tillman, J. B., Walford, R. L. & Spindler, S. R. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, E352–E360.10444432
  20. 10.1016/0047-6374(89)90049-3 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05659.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S1566-3124(03)14004-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1530/acta.0.1250093 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/emboj/17.2.455 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0047-6374(90)90030-J · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00339-6 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/153537020122600607 · DOI
  28. 10.1023/A:1020950420196 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/ng0497-356 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/jn/120.11.1412 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/jn/127.9.1758 · DOI
  32. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4972 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nm0102-3 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02289-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9995 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7690 · DOI
  37. 10.1006/exnr.1998.7002 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1021/bi00417a035 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S1382-6689(01)00077-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Dhahbi, J. M., Kim, H.-J., Mote, P. L., Beaver, R. J., & Spindler, S. R.
Affiliations
BioMarker Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated, 900 East Hamilton Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008; and Departments of Biochemistry and Statistics, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-03-25
Volume
101
Issue
15
Pages
5524-5529
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
205
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review