The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The loss function of sensorimotor learning
Open accessAbstract
Motor learning can be defined as changing performance so as to optimize some function of the task, such as accuracy. The measure of accuracy that is optimized is called a loss function and specifies how the CNS rates the relative success or cost of a particular movement outcome. Models of pointing in sensorimotor control and learning usually assume a quadratic loss function in which the mean squared error is minimized. Here we develop a technique for measuring the loss associated with errors. Subjects were required to perform a task while we experimentally controlled the skewness of the distribution of errors they experienced. Based on the change in the subjects' average performance, we infer the loss function. We show that people use a loss function in which the cost increases approximately quadratically with error for small errors and significantly less than quadratically for large errors. The system is thus robust to outliers. This suggests that models of sensorimotor control and learning that have assumed minimizing squared error are a good approximation but tend to penalize large errors excessively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model
Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-07-01688.1985 · Cited by 4,395
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination
Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn963 · Cited by 3,081
Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning
Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29528 · Cited by 2,498
Self-citationLearning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives
Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35037588 · Cited by 945
Learning to move amid uncertainty
Scheidt, R. A., Dingwell, J. B., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.971 · Cited by 411
Cited by
Optimality principles in sensorimotor control
Todorov, E. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1309 · Cited by 1,746
Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception
Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shams, L. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000943 · Cited by 1,069
Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control
Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.003 · Cited by 867
Self-citationPatton, J. L., Stoykov, M. E., Kovic, M., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0097-8 · Cited by 469
Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.
Bowers, J. S., & Davis, C. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0026450 · Cited by 436
Metadata
- Authors
- Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-06-21
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 9839-9842
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2160291974
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The loss function of sensorimotor learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0308394101
- The paper
- Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308394101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.