Cited by 411Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Learning to move amid uncertainty

Scheidt, Robert A., Dingwell, Jonathan B., Mussa-Ivaldi, Ferdinando A.·2001·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We studied how subjects learned to make movements against unpredictable perturbations. Twelve healthy human subjects made goal-directed reaching movements in the horizontal plane while holding the handle of a two-joint robotic manipulator. The robot generated viscous force fields that perturbed the limb perpendicular to the desired direction of movement. The amplitude (but not the direction) of the viscous field varied randomly from trial to trial. Systems identification techniques were employed to characterize how subjects adapted to these random perturbations. Subject performance was quantified primarily using the peak deviation from a straight-line hand path. Subjects adapted their arm movements to the sequence of random force-field amplitudes. This adaptive response compensated for the approximate mean from the random sequence of perturbations and did not depend on the statistical distribution of that sequence. Subjects did not adapt by directly counteracting the mean field strength itself on each trial but rather by using information about perturbations and movement errors from a limited number of previous trials to adjust motor commands on subsequent trials. This strategy permitted subjects to achieve near-optimal performance (defined as minimizing movement errors in a least-squares sense) while maintaining computational efficiency. A simple model using information about movement errors and perturbation amplitudes from a single previous trial predicted subject performance in stochastic environments with a high degree of fidelity and further predicted key performance features observed in nonstochastic environments. This suggests that the neural structures modified during motor adaptation require only short-term memory. Explicit representations regarding movements made more than a few trials in the past are not used in generating optimal motor responses on any given trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.971

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheidt, R. A., Dingwell, J. B., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Marquette University (US)
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
971-985
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1873164297
Cited by
411
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH-48185, P50MH048185)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS35673, R01NS035673)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
motor adaptation, visuomotor perturbation, reaching movements, short-term memory, stochastic environments
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Humans, Memory, Models, Biological, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Regression Analysis, Stochastic Processes, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review