The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning
Open accessAbstract
Practicing certain visual tasks leads, as a result of a process termed “perceptual learning,” to a significant improvement in performance. Learning is specific for basic stimulus features such as local orientation, retinal location, and eye of presentation, suggesting modification of neuronal processes at the primary visual cortex in adults. It is not known, however, whether such low-level learning affects higher-level visual tasks such as recognition. By systematic low-level training of an adult visual system malfunctioning as a result of abnormal development (leading to amblyopia) of the primary visual cortex during the “critical period,” we show here that induction of low-level changes might yield significant perceptual benefits that transfer to higher visual tasks. The training procedure resulted in a 2-fold improvement in contrast sensitivity and in letter-recognition tasks. These findings demonstrate that perceptual learning can improve basic representations within an adult visual system that did not develop during the critical period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex
Crist, R. E., Li, W., & Gilbert, C. D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/87470 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Sale, A., Maya Vetencourt, J. F., Medini, P., Cenni, M. C., Baroncelli, L., De Pasquale, R., & Maffei, L. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1899 · Cited by 492
Perceptual Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Theory
Watanabe, T., & Sasaki, Y. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015214 · Cited by 347
Nurturing brain plasticity: Impact of environmental enrichment
Baroncelli, L., Braschi, C., Spolidoro, M., Begenisic, T., Sale, A., & Maffei, L. (2010) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2009.193 · Cited by 330
Development of pattern vision following early and extended blindness
Kalia, A., Lesmes, L. A., Dorr, M., Gandhi, T., Chatterjee, G., Ganesh, S., Bex, P. J., & Sinha, P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1311041111 · Cited by 106
Training improves visual processing speed and generalizes to untrained functions
Lev, M., Ludwig, K., Gilaie-Dotan, S., Voss, S., Sterzer, P., Hesselmann, G., & Polat, U. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07251 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Polat, U., Ma-Naim, T., Belkin, M., & Sagi, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-04-19
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6692-6697
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2103979872
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0401200101
- The paper
- Polat, U., Ma-Naim, T., Belkin, M., & Sagi, D. (2004). Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401200101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.