The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facile isolation and the characterization of human retinal stem cells
Open accessAbstract
This study identifies and characterizes retinal stem cells (RSCs) in early postnatal to seventh-decade human eyes. Different subregions of human eyes were dissociated and cultured by using a clonal sphere-forming assay. The stem cells were derived only from the pars plicata and pars plana of the retinal ciliary margin, at a frequency of ≈1:500. To test for long-term self-renewal, both the sphere assay and monolayer passaging were used. By using the single sphere passaging assay, primary spheres were dissociated and replated, and individual spheres demonstrated 100% self-renewal, with single spheres giving rise to one or more new spheres in each subsequent passage. The clonal retinal spheres were plated under differentiation conditions to assay the differentiation potential of their progeny. The spheres were produced all of the different retinal cell types, demonstrating multipotentiality. Therefore, the human eye contains a small population of cells (≈10,000 cells per eye) that have retinal stem-cell characteristics (proliferation, self-renewal, and multipotentiality). To test the in vivo potential of the stem cells and their progeny, we transplanted dissociated human retinal sphere cells, containing both stem cells and progenitors, into the eyes of postnatal day 1 NOD/SCID mice and embryonic chick eyes. The progeny of the RSCs were able to survive, migrate, integrate, and differentiate into the neural retina, especially as photoreceptors. Their facile isolation, integration, and differentiation suggest that human RSCs eventually may be valuable in treating human retinal diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a self-inactivating lentivirus vector
Miyoshi, H., Blömer, U., Takahashi, M., Gage, F. H., & Verma, I. M. (1998) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.72.10.8150-8157.1998 · Cited by 1,196
Robust neural integration from retinal transplants in mice deficient in GFAP and vimentin
Kinouchi, R., Takeda, M., Yang, L., Wilhelmsson, U., Lundkvist, A., Pekny, M., & Chen, D. F. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1088 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Hartong, D. T., Berson, E. L., & Dryja, T. P. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69740-7 · Cited by 2,924
Regeneration of the retina: toward stem cell therapy for degenerative retinal diseases
Jeon, S., & Oh, I.-H. (2015) · BMB Reports · doi:10.5483/bmbrep.2015.48.4.276 · Cited by 54
Susaki, K., & Chiba, C. (2007) · Pigment Cell Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0749.2007.00407.x · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Coles, B. L. K., Angénieux, B., Inoue, T., Del Rio-Tsonis, K., Spence, J. R., McInnes, R. R., Arsenijevic, Y., & van der Kooy, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-10-25
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 15772-15777
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1978371504
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Facile isolation and the characterization of human retinal stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0401596101
- The paper
- Coles, B. L. K., Angénieux, B., Inoue, T., Del Rio-Tsonis, K., Spence, J. R., McInnes, R. R., Arsenijevic, Y., & van der Kooy, D. (2004). Facile isolation and the characterization of human retinal stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401596101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.