Cited by 229Retinal Development and DisordersNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Robust neural integration from retinal transplants in mice deficient in GFAP and vimentin

Kinouchi, Reiko, Takeda, Masumi, Yang, Liu, Wilhelmsson, Ulrika, Lundkvist, Andrea, Pekny, Milos, Chen, Dong Feng·2003·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

With recent progress in neuroscience and stem-cell research, neural transplantation has emerged as a promising therapy for treating CNS diseases. The success of transplantation has been limited, however, by the restricted ability of neural implants to survive and establish neuronal connections with the host. Little is known about the mechanisms responsible for this failure. Neural implantation triggers reactive gliosis, a process accompanied by upregulation of intermediate filaments in astrocytes and formation of astroglial scar tissue. Here we show that the retinas of adult mice deficient in glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin, and consequently lacking intermediate filaments in reactive astrocytes and Müller cells, provide a permissive environment for grafted neurons to migrate and extend neurites. The transplanted cells integrated robustly into the host retina with distinct neuronal identity and appropriate neuronal projections. Our results indicate an essential role for reactive astroglial cells in preventing neural graft integration after transplantation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1088

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gfap−/−Vim−/− mice support better integration of neural grafts in the retina and neuronal and astrocyte differentiation of neural stem cells transplanted in the hippocampus.

    “They also support better integration of neural grafts in the retina (37) and neuronal and astrocyte differentiation of neural stem cells transplanted in the hippocampus (38).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinouchi, R., Takeda, M., Yang, L., Wilhelmsson, U., Lundkvist, A., Pekny, M., & Chen, D. F.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Asahikawa Medical College Hospital (JP)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Pekny, Milos
  • Chen, Dong Feng
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2003-07-06
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
863-868
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2063498603
Cited by
229
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY012983, EY012983)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
retinal transplantation, reactive gliosis, astrocytes, Müller cells, glial fibrillary acidic protein, vimentin, intermediate filaments, glial scar, neurite outgrowth, neuronal migration, graft survival
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Movement, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Neurons, Retina, Vimentin, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review