Cited by 265Congenital heart defects researchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Essential role of Sox9 in the pathway that controls formation of cardiac valves and septa

Open access
Akiyama, Haruhiko, Chaboissier, Marie-Christine, Behringer, Richard R., Rowitch, David H., Schedl, Andreas, Epstein, Jonathan A., de Crombrugghe, Benoit·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Epithelial–mesenchymal transformation is a critical developmental process reiterated in multiple organs throughout embryogenesis. Formation of endocardial cushions, primordia of valves and septa, is a classic example of epithelial–mesenchymal transformation. Several gene mutations are known to affect cardiac valve formation. Sox9 is activated when endocardial endothelial cells undergo mesenchymal transformation and migrate into an extracellular matrix, called cardiac jelly, to form endocardial cushions. In Sox9 -null mutants, endocardial cushions are markedly hypoplastic. In these mutants, Nfatc1 is ectopically expressed and no longer restricted to endothelial cells. Further, Sox9-deficient endocardial mesenchymal cells fail to express ErbB3 , which is required for endocardial cushion cell differentiation and proliferation. Our results reveal a succession of molecular steps in the pathway of endocardial cushion development. We propose that loss of Sox9 inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transformation after delamination and initial migration, but before definitive mesenchymal transformation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0401711101

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Jiang, X., Rowitch, D. H., Soriano, P., McMahon, A. P. & Sucov, H. M. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 1607-1616.
  2. Epstein, J. A., Li, J., Lang, D., Chen, F., Brown, C. B., Jin, F., Lu, M. M., Thomas, M., Liu, E., Wessels, A. & Lo, C. W. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 1869-1878.
  3. Lakkis, M. M. & Epstein, J. A. (1998) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 125, 4359-4367.
  4. Erickson, S. L., O'Shea, K. S., Ghaboosi, N., Loverro, L., Frantz, G., Bauer, M., Lu, L. H. & Moore, M. W. (1997) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 124, 4999-5011.
  5. Morrison-Graham, K., Schatteman, G. C., Bork, T., Bowen-Pope, D. F. & Weston, J. A. (1992) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 115, 133-142.
  6. Kumai, M., Nishii, K., Nakamura, K., Takeda, N., Suzuki, M. & Shibata, Y. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 3501-3512.
  7. Kent, J., Wheatley, S. C., Andrews, J. E., Sinclair, A. H. & Koopman, P. (1996) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 122, 2813-2822.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Akiyama, H., Chaboissier, M.-C., Behringer, R. R., Rowitch, D. H., Schedl, A., Epstein, J. A., & de Crombrugghe, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U470, Centre de Biochimie, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice Cedex 2, France; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115; and Cardiovascular Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-04-19
Volume
101
Issue
17
Pages
6502-6507
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2029022250
Cited by
265
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA-16 672)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-16672, P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
SOX9, endocardial cushion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, NFATc1, HER3, cardiac jelly, endocardial endothelial cells, heart development
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Female, Heart Septum, Heart Valves, High Mobility Group Proteins, Mesoderm, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Pregnancy, Transcription Factors, Receptor, ErbB-3, Mice, SOX9 Transcription Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review